Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Post your questions and suggestions here.
User avatar
Pyrrho
Administrator
Posts: 10441
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:31 am
Contact:

Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Pyrrho » Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:04 pm

Given the recent fracas over this rule:

Copyright infringement. Users may post very brief excerpts of content from other websites, with a link to the online source. This should be no more than a short paragraph, accompanied by commentary.

I am interested in your suggestions and recommendations to make this rule restrictive enough to protect the forum's legal backside while permitting sufficient Fair Use of content belonging to someone else.

This does include the posting of images.

What say you?
For any forum questions or concerns please e-mail skepticforum@gmail.com or send a PM.

The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Real Skeptic
Posts: 20490
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:23 pm

Ja bull.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
scrmbldggs
Real Skeptic
Posts: 21144
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 7:55 am
Custom Title: something
Location: somewhere

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby scrmbldggs » Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:55 pm

Would it be OK if one used
Hidden Content
This board requires you to be registered and logged-in to view hidden content.
for content one is uncertain about?
.

Lard, save me from your followers.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 12154
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Sat Feb 10, 2018 4:01 pm

I would think hidden content is still "posting" and would not avoid whatever rule is of interest.

I agree its unworkable to accept some posters affirmation that they have secured permission to use copyrighted material. Its only half the point as posts should be a digested and targeted summary of whatever reference is being relied upon.....not as some have done here post a lengthy link in its entirety either all at once or obviously in a series of 4-5 posts strung together.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
scrmbldggs
Real Skeptic
Posts: 21144
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 7:55 am
Custom Title: something
Location: somewhere

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby scrmbldggs » Sat Feb 10, 2018 4:15 pm

The hidden feature takes it out of the public sphere and I didn't mean it as a free for all usage. That's why I thought it might be useful for images and the occasional text (excerpts) that can't be linked to. History has shown that it's only a certain kind of user that wants to disregard the rule, even after having been made aware of it.
.

Lard, save me from your followers.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 12154
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Sat Feb 10, 2018 4:16 pm

I don't think that is what "public" means. We are all pubus.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
Pyrrho
Administrator
Posts: 10441
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:31 am
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Pyrrho » Sat Feb 10, 2018 4:34 pm

The "hidden" tag hides it from guests and bots and scrapers, so I guess it makes a kind of sense. The fundamental issue is that posting on a forum qualifies as "publishing", at least that's how I understand my reading of legal advisories on the copyright question.

Best to keep within basic Fair Use guidelines. One or two brief excerpts, with some commentary of your own.

In these modern days of "Share this!" links a source loses standing if they encourage sharing...yet I have seen bloggers who became quite irate when their work was taken and published elsewhere without their knowledge or consent.

Images have always been a challenge. At least we are not trying to monetize anything that is posted here.

I could set up a separate bbcode for images that hides them from guests by appropriating some of the "hidden" code.

Could also probably tweak the existing image bbcode but it would be best for me to leave the core system alone.

But, again, that would be trying to hide the basic fact of republishing someone else's work.
For any forum questions or concerns please e-mail skepticforum@gmail.com or send a PM.

The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 27523
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Matthew Ellard » Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:05 am

I think the current rule is sound, as is, concerning text based copyrights.
Pyrrho wrote: This does include the posting of images.
I understand protecting the forum, may mean I can no longer use existing copyright images. like Mickey Mouse, in my cartoons. I can accept and agree with that.

I will go with what's best for the forum, on this matter.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Real Skeptic
Posts: 20490
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:11 am

Is the Bible copyrighted?

Asking for a friend.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
scrmbldggs
Real Skeptic
Posts: 21144
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 7:55 am
Custom Title: something
Location: somewhere

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby scrmbldggs » Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:18 am

:hmm: I think it's copywronged.
.

Lard, save me from your followers.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Real Skeptic
Posts: 20490
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:31 am

scrmbldggs wrote::hmm: I think it's copywronged.

Copycrapped.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
Gord
Obnoxious Weed
Posts: 30144
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:44 am
Custom Title: Silent Ork
Location: Transcona

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Gord » Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:31 am

I never know what to do when I'm posting exerpts of copyrighted material. If I don't post enough of it to get the message across, then I haven't posted enough of it. (I mean, that makes sense, right, even if it sounds circular?)

So I always try to avoid posting the parts that aren't necessary to make the point -- for instance, this: viewtopic.php?f=33&t=29098&p=630110#p629855 That's five full paragraphs and one partial paragraph from an article that is 17 paragraphs long (some of those paragraphs are only one sentence, because...jeez, articles are always doing that these days!).

But what if the original only had one point in it? I mean, I could post exerpts from Macbeth easily enough because there's a lot more to it that a single idea.

Crap, I'm being called away from the computer. I'll come back to this in a while. My point is: I don't think I'm doing it right and I want to investigate further.
"Knowledge grows through infinite timelessness" -- the random fictional Deepak Chopra quote site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 12154
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:34 am

Its easy. A self created summary of the point you wish to make.........and a link. No copy of anything need be made. If you do copy.......make it relevant to your own summary. This is true for art work too, just harder to conceptualize what comment/point/fair use of the work you are making.....
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
scrmbldggs
Real Skeptic
Posts: 21144
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 7:55 am
Custom Title: something
Location: somewhere

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby scrmbldggs » Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:58 am

It's not just the "how much", it's also the "what's the most important (valuable) portion of the text". (On "how much", I try to stick with a modest percentage more than with "a paragraph".)
.

Lard, save me from your followers.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Real Skeptic
Posts: 20490
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Feb 11, 2018 1:44 am

I most do "collection" sites, news and views. They post summaries, I repost enough to let the reader decide if chasing the link is something they want to do. Saves time and confusion IMNSHO. Nobody's complained.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
scrmbldggs
Real Skeptic
Posts: 21144
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 7:55 am
Custom Title: something
Location: somewhere

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby scrmbldggs » Sun Feb 11, 2018 1:50 am

"Nobody's complained." - Ignore function is bliss. :-P
.

Lard, save me from your followers.

User avatar
Pyrrho
Administrator
Posts: 10441
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:31 am
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Pyrrho » Sun Feb 11, 2018 1:54 am

This article has links to several references on the subject.

http://www.managingcommunities.com/2010 ... -articles/

Stanford's resources on the subject are quite thorough.

https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/f ... r-factors/
For any forum questions or concerns please e-mail skepticforum@gmail.com or send a PM.

The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.

User avatar
Pyrrho
Administrator
Posts: 10441
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:31 am
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Pyrrho » Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:59 pm

I like the idea of "1/5 or 1/6" limit for quoting a text article.
For any forum questions or concerns please e-mail skepticforum@gmail.com or send a PM.

The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.

User avatar
scrmbldggs
Real Skeptic
Posts: 21144
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 7:55 am
Custom Title: something
Location: somewhere

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby scrmbldggs » Sun Feb 11, 2018 1:30 pm

1/5 to 1/6" seems a good yardstick. :-P
.

Lard, save me from your followers.

User avatar
Pyrrho
Administrator
Posts: 10441
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:31 am
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Pyrrho » Sun Feb 11, 2018 2:25 pm

I suppose I could use picas or agates, based on the point size of the typeface.
For any forum questions or concerns please e-mail skepticforum@gmail.com or send a PM.

The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Real Skeptic
Posts: 20490
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Feb 11, 2018 2:33 pm

Pyrrho wrote:I suppose I could use picas or agates, based on the point size of the typeface.

Agates? That would be ... awesome.

Spoiler:
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
scrmbldggs
Real Skeptic
Posts: 21144
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 7:55 am
Custom Title: something
Location: somewhere

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby scrmbldggs » Sun Feb 11, 2018 2:39 pm

Yup! One could carve out a nice piece with agates.
.

Lard, save me from your followers.

User avatar
Pyrrho
Administrator
Posts: 10441
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:31 am
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Pyrrho » Sun Feb 11, 2018 4:33 pm

I tried something that would make posted images into clickable thumbnails that would then show the full-size image in a popover, but it disabled every link in the forum.
For any forum questions or concerns please e-mail skepticforum@gmail.com or send a PM.

The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 12154
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Sun Feb 11, 2018 4:42 pm

I don't see why a thumbnail would change the liability at all, if there was one. What is the "downside" for a clear violation? Seems like the only thing I hear about is takedown notices being issued and complied with? Copywright holders get motivated when someone is making $$$ off the infringement. I don't see that going on here at all.

.....................but I'm no expert, and DO want you to sleep soundly at night................

Edit: Thumbnail: just a smaller picture of the whole?.....aka: the copywrighted image itself. If the thumbnail is more of an icon just to show the link is to a picture....or video...then yes that would be effective.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
Gord
Obnoxious Weed
Posts: 30144
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:44 am
Custom Title: Silent Ork
Location: Transcona

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Gord » Sun Feb 11, 2018 10:11 pm

Pyrrho wrote:Stanford's resources on the subject are quite thorough.

https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/f ... r-factors/

Blarg. :? Looks like I've always violated the section "The Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Taken" every time I've ever quoted portions of anything:

...However, even if you take a small portion of a work, your copying will not be a fair use if the portion taken is the “heart” of the work. In other words, you are more likely to run into problems if you take the most memorable aspect of a work....

Well, "the heart of the work" is what I'm trying to post about! :slapfight:

(Either that, or I don't understand what they mean by "the heart of the work".)
"Knowledge grows through infinite timelessness" -- the random fictional Deepak Chopra quote site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE

User avatar
JO 753
Has No Life
Posts: 12625
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:21 pm
Custom Title: rezident owtsidr
Location: BLaNDLaND
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby JO 753 » Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:05 pm

Pyrrho wrote:I tried something that would make posted images into clickable thumbnails that would then show the full-size image in a popover, but it disabled every link in the forum.


Do all forumz uze a 3rd party imaje website?

The Chrysler forum I'm in haz thouzandz uv ruined posts kuz wutstheirname desided they wanted to make money. They uze Postimaje now and it showz up az a good size thumnail that you can click if youre interested in seeing it full size.
Gubmint for us
http://www.7532020.com
not the rich.

Aztexan
King of the Limericks
King of the Limericks
Posts: 8373
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:39 pm

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Aztexan » Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:30 pm

Well my main sources of information I post here come from my drunken idiot cousin and that weird guy that hangs out near the playground at the park and they don't mind if their knowledge is shared so :beee: with your :rulez:
trump is literally a piece of {!#%@}.

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 8K Posts
Posts: 8291
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby TJrandom » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:28 pm

I`ll be happy to flaunt whatever rules are set in place.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Real Skeptic
Posts: 20490
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:31 pm

TJrandom wrote:I`ll be happy to flaunt whatever rules are set in place.


"flout"
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 8K Posts
Posts: 8291
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby TJrandom » Tue Feb 13, 2018 2:43 am

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
TJrandom wrote:I`ll be happy to flaunt whatever rules are set in place.


"flout"


Flauntingly flout? :oops:

User avatar
ElectricMonk
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3557
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 6:21 pm
Custom Title: His Beatitude

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby ElectricMonk » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:16 am

Sorry, I simply don't know enough about copyright law or the amount of risk the forum hosts are willing to take to be of any use in this discussion
I grew up when we would swap cassette tapes with new tracks or floppy disks with games as a matter of course.
I've come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies:
Spoiler:
1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.
2. Anything that's invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it.
3. Anything invented after you're thirty-five is against the natural order of things.
- Douglas Adams

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Real Skeptic
Posts: 20490
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:54 am

"serious" copyright violations are for profit. Most get a thunderous copypasta email.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
Upton_O_Goode
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3151
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2017 1:15 am
Custom Title: Hywel Rudy Day
Location: The Land Formerly Known as Pangea

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Upton_O_Goode » Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:45 pm

Pyrrho wrote:Given the recent fracas over this rule:

Copyright infringement. Users may post very brief excerpts of content from other websites, with a link to the online source. This should be no more than a short paragraph, accompanied by commentary.

I am interested in your suggestions and recommendations to make this rule restrictive enough to protect the forum's legal backside while permitting sufficient Fair Use of content belonging to someone else.

This does include the posting of images.

What say you?


I'm happy to abide by that, not being technically competent enough to post an image unless I have a url for it.
"Relieve yourself of the illusion that you're writing for the ages. The ages will decide who is doing that on their own; you don't get a vote."

John Scalzi, Don't Live for Your Obituary, p. 124.

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 8K Posts
Posts: 8291
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby TJrandom » Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:28 pm

I don`t do images either – grainy, gravure, graven…

User avatar
Pyrrho
Administrator
Posts: 10441
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:31 am
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Pyrrho » Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:29 pm

Still working on the thumbnail thing. For great justice. Before someone sets us up the bomb.
For any forum questions or concerns please e-mail skepticforum@gmail.com or send a PM.

The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.

User avatar
Monster
Has More Than 5K Posts
Posts: 5075
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Monster » Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:04 pm

Pyrrho wrote:Given the recent fracas over this rule:

Copyright infringement. Users may post very brief excerpts of content from other websites, with a link to the online source. This should be no more than a short paragraph, accompanied by commentary.

I am interested in your suggestions and recommendations to make this rule restrictive enough to protect the forum's legal backside while permitting sufficient Fair Use of content belonging to someone else.

This does include the posting of images.

What say you?

Regarding quoting, I'll be satisfied with whatever you decide. The current loose guideline* is acceptable to me. If you want to limit quoting to 1/5 or 1/6 the content of a linked-to article, that's fine with me too.

Regarding images, I'm not sure what to do.

* I say "loose" guideline, because I couldn't find anything about quoting articles in the FAQ. The quoted text above, that you wrote, Pyrrho, is the only written guideline I found.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 8K Posts
Posts: 8291
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby TJrandom » Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:35 pm

Wait... would a 1/5 rule apply to quotes of stuff authored by other forum posters, or just to outside content? I`d hate to need to do word counts...

User avatar
JO 753
Has No Life
Posts: 12625
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:21 pm
Custom Title: rezident owtsidr
Location: BLaNDLaND
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby JO 753 » Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:42 pm

This duznt apply to your own work published elsewhere first duz it?

I dont see "Open Letter To Robert Mueller" in Politics.
Gubmint for us
http://www.7532020.com
not the rich.

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 8K Posts
Posts: 8291
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby TJrandom » Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:47 pm

Oh, on word counts... do JO`s letter combinations count as words? :mrgreen:

User avatar
Pyrrho
Administrator
Posts: 10441
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:31 am
Contact:

Re: Discussion: The Copyright Rule

Postby Pyrrho » Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:14 pm

TJrandom wrote:Wait... would a 1/5 rule apply to quotes of stuff authored by other forum posters, or just to outside content? I`d hate to need to do word counts...

Outside content only.

Posting on a discussion board means that other users can quote your posts, even in full. This is called "implied license."

That said, the post content belongs to the individual who posted it. I have complied with requests by former users to remove their posts. There was one case in which I did remove a quoted post; the person felt it could identify them and they wanted it gone.
For any forum questions or concerns please e-mail skepticforum@gmail.com or send a PM.

The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus.


Return to “Help Desk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest