Good/Bad New Moviez

Weird things people do.
User avatar
Major Malfunction
Has No Life
Posts: 11388
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:20 am
Custom Title: Dérailleur Énigmatique

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Major Malfunction » Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:28 pm

JO 753 wrote:Colossal

Very different & good. Hard to catagorize it in my opinion, but the library put it in the comedy section.

Colossal was {!#%@}. Three and a half piles of turds.
This being was produced using the same process as other beings, and therefore, may contain traces of nuts.

User avatar
JO 753
Has No Life
Posts: 12289
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:21 pm
Custom Title: rezident owtsidr
Location: BLaNDLaND
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby JO 753 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:18 pm

You just didnt get it. Watch it at least 5 more timez and it'l start making sens.
Gubmint for us
http://www.7532020.com
not the rich.

User avatar
Major Malfunction
Has No Life
Posts: 11388
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:20 am
Custom Title: Dérailleur Énigmatique

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Major Malfunction » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:58 pm

It took me at least that much longer to scrape it off my boot.
This being was produced using the same process as other beings, and therefore, may contain traces of nuts.

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4988
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Monster » Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:12 am

It

It's a good movie. Very creepy in many parts.

Spoiler:
That kid with the glasses, from Stranger Things, was really annoying.

I like this Pennywise much more than Tim Curry's.

My only complaint is that a lot of the scenes randomly changed into each other. It was mildly annoying.

Pennywise's last word in the movie was stupid. It was "fear". Bah.


Recommendation: See it if you like horror.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4988
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Monster » Thu Sep 21, 2017 2:33 am

Life

It's an ok horror movie. Judging by the trailer alone, you can instantly guess that it's an Alien knockoff where the humans die one by one. It's a bit on the icky side.

Spoiler:
The failure in the laboratory (where the alien was housed) was stupid. It's like the lab was designed to fail.

Shittons of idiotic whisper dialog. It's almost the only way the actors speak.

It had an unhappy ending, which was kind of expected.


Recommendation: See if you like space horror movies where humans die one by one and you know basically everything that will happen.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
JO 753
Has No Life
Posts: 12289
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:21 pm
Custom Title: rezident owtsidr
Location: BLaNDLaND
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby JO 753 » Tue Sep 26, 2017 7:50 am

I didnt like Life. I agree with your assessment. Nothing really orijinal.

Suicide Squad wuz not az bad az I wuz expecting. It continuez DC'z theme uv making their karakterz unlikable.

The Take starring Idres Elba iz a good action film. Its refreshing to see sumthing thats not trying to be the greatest ever. The action iz realistic. Idres duznt dispatch the bad guyz az if they were styrofoam dummyz. He even loozez sum fites!

I didnt mention that the title muzik in Colossal iz seriously louzy. Well, The Take tops it with a song during the end credits sung by Idres that must make him glad the movie iznt well known.
Gubmint for us
http://www.7532020.com
not the rich.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Has No Life
Posts: 19695
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Tue Sep 26, 2017 12:16 pm

Monster wrote:It

It's a good movie. Very creepy in many parts.

Spoiler:
That kid with the glasses, from Stranger Things, was really annoying.

I like this Pennywise much more than Tim Curry's.

My only complaint is that a lot of the scenes randomly changed into each other. It was mildly annoying.

Pennywise's last word in the movie was stupid. It was "fear". Bah.


Recommendation: See it if you like horror.

Spoiler:
He's the one that grows up to be the insult comic.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has More Than 6K Posts
Posts: 6176
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Jeffk 1970 » Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:55 pm

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
Monster wrote:It

It's a good movie. Very creepy in many parts.

Spoiler:
That kid with the glasses, from Stranger Things, was really annoying.

I like this Pennywise much more than Tim Curry's.

My only complaint is that a lot of the scenes randomly changed into each other. It was mildly annoying.

Pennywise's last word in the movie was stupid. It was "fear". Bah.


Recommendation: See it if you like horror.

Spoiler:
He's the one that grows up to be the insult comic.


Saw this, highly recommended. I appreciated the "80's" feel.

Some complaints:

Time factor, per the movie a month passed without anything happening.

Issues with the friendships among the characters, anyone who read the book will know what I'm talking about.

A rather major character in the book was reduced to a very minor character in the movie.

Pluses:

Some parts of the movie honestly scared the crap out of me.

Pennywise was awesome.

I liked the child actors, they matched what I thought they should be like in the book. My only complaint was with the actor who played Ben, his acting was fine but he was not quite what I pictured.

I thought it did a good job with the source material, it's one of the better King adaptations I've seen. The original book is split between the 1950's and 1980's, I think it was a good update.


I still think that IT would make a better miniseries on HBO or Showtime, some parts of the movie seemed rushed because of the time factor. It makes me wonder what was cut out and I'm hoping for a Director's Cut. I think it was a good decision to split it into two movies.

I say see this one if you like horror movies.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Has No Life
Posts: 19695
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:46 pm

If you see the original miniseries you'll understand why another one is unlikely.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
Major Malfunction
Has No Life
Posts: 11388
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:20 am
Custom Title: Dérailleur Énigmatique

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Major Malfunction » Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:53 pm

If you'd read anything Stephen King has written, you'd understand why any movie based on his scratchings would suck from the start.
This being was produced using the same process as other beings, and therefore, may contain traces of nuts.

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has More Than 6K Posts
Posts: 6176
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Jeffk 1970 » Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:19 am

Major Malfunction wrote:If you'd read anything Stephen King has written, you'd understand why any movie based on his scratchings would suck from the start.



I enjoy King's earlier writings, 'Salem's Lot is a good, old-fashioned vampire story, IT works really well as a supernatural/monster story, Pet Semetary is very chilling though the movie sucked, The Stand is a great good vs. evil post-apocalyptic story, Carrie was great.

There are very few good King movie adaptations.

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has More Than 6K Posts
Posts: 6176
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Jeffk 1970 » Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:20 am

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:If you see the original miniseries you'll understand why another one is unlikely.



I did, Timothy Curry made a great Pennywise. The rest, meh. It needs an HBO to do it properly, not network TV.

User avatar
Major Malfunction
Has No Life
Posts: 11388
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:20 am
Custom Title: Dérailleur Énigmatique

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Major Malfunction » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:02 am

Jeffk 1970 wrote:
Major Malfunction wrote:If you'd read anything Stephen King has written, you'd understand why any movie based on his scratchings would suck from the start.

I enjoy King's earlier writings, 'Salem's Lot is a good, old-fashioned vampire story, IT works really well as a supernatural/monster story, Pet Semetary is very chilling though the movie sucked, The Stand is a great good vs. evil post-apocalyptic story, Carrie was great.

There are very few good King movie adaptations.

I put him in the same donation box as PK Dickwad and L Wand Blubbard.

It's pretty clear they're schizophrenic.

The characters are cardboard cutouts of themselves, there's no plot, there's no development, it just rambles on until the writer gets tired of pressing buttons an

They were paid by the word.
This being was produced using the same process as other beings, and therefore, may contain traces of nuts.

User avatar
JO 753
Has No Life
Posts: 12289
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:21 pm
Custom Title: rezident owtsidr
Location: BLaNDLaND
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby JO 753 » Fri Sep 29, 2017 5:15 pm

Christine iz great.
Gubmint for us
http://www.7532020.com
not the rich.

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has More Than 6K Posts
Posts: 6176
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Jeffk 1970 » Sat Sep 30, 2017 9:18 pm

Major Malfunction wrote:
Jeffk 1970 wrote:
Major Malfunction wrote:If you'd read anything Stephen King has written, you'd understand why any movie based on his scratchings would suck from the start.

I enjoy King's earlier writings, 'Salem's Lot is a good, old-fashioned vampire story, IT works really well as a supernatural/monster story, Pet Semetary is very chilling though the movie sucked, The Stand is a great good vs. evil post-apocalyptic story, Carrie was great.

There are very few good King movie adaptations.

I put him in the same donation box as PK Dickwad and L Wand Blubbard.

It's pretty clear they're schizophrenic.

The characters are cardboard cutouts of themselves, there's no plot, there's no development, it just rambles on until the writer gets tired of pressing buttons an

They were paid by the word.


Hhhhhhmmmm, not quite sure but I think you are not a fan of Stephen King and his work.... :lol:

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4988
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Monster » Thu Oct 05, 2017 1:47 am

Return to Oz from 1985

It's a good movie. The movie was examined by some writer on some website and he said it's actually a kind of horror movie. I agree with that.

The Scarecrow looks like a hideous monster. Tik-Tok is a great character. Fairuza Balk (Dorothy) grew up to be hot. The claymation was great. There's an interview of Fairuza Balk on the DVD, as an adult, and she's got a funky voice. Her voice when she was a little girl was normal sounding, but her adult voice is funky.

Recommendation: See it if you like surreal fantasy movies.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4988
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Monster » Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:03 am

Halloween from 1978.

It's fine. Not particularly great. Jamie Lee Curtis's first role.

Recommendation: See it if you have nothing else to do.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
JO 753
Has No Life
Posts: 12289
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:21 pm
Custom Title: rezident owtsidr
Location: BLaNDLaND
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby JO 753 » Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:15 am

Gubmint for us
http://www.7532020.com
not the rich.

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has More Than 6K Posts
Posts: 6176
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Jeffk 1970 » Thu Oct 05, 2017 12:09 pm

Monster wrote:Halloween from 1978.

It's fine. Not particularly great. Jamie Lee Curtis's first role.

Recommendation: See it if you have nothing else to do.



Disagree with you there, that's one I put in my top 10 horror movies of all time.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Has No Life
Posts: 19695
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Thu Oct 05, 2017 12:38 pm

Kingsman: The Golden Circle, adequate sequel to the original. Elton John looked like a peacock on acid, as usual.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4988
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Monster » Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:22 am

Blade Runner 2049

It's very good. I really enjoyed it. Exquisite visuals, good musical score. The movie was a breath of fresh air from the extremely formulaic superhero and Star Trek movies.

Spoiler:
Ryan Gosling couldn't be accused of overacting in this movie, and that's ok.

K's artificial girlfriend is a goddess. That body, wow.

Some parts of the movie didn't make much sense. The part that bothered me the most was the whole capturing Deckard thing.

This movie had the most crying I've ever seen. I mean, by the measurement of the number of characters crying. One particular character must have cried on three separate occasions. And that particular character had the highest body count in the movie!


Recommendation: See it if you like sci fi.

American Made

It's an ok movie. Tom Cruise seems to play the same character in all of his movies, and that is a giant flaming douchebag that is in love with himself.

Spoiler:
Tom Cruise's character was a sociopath who was responsible for the deaths of many people. It was nice that he was murdered at the end of the movie.

Tom Cruise's character made the largest number of bad decisions I've ever seen in a movie. I suppose it was his greed that got in the way of everything.


Recommendation: See it if you have nothing else to do. Maybe you'll like it more than I did.
Last edited by Monster on Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 26573
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Matthew Ellard » Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:30 am

Monster wrote:Blade Runner 2049

It's very good.
OK. That's good news. I was worried it may be awful. We will go see it over the next two weeks and I'll make post comments if anything confuses me.

User avatar
Major Malfunction
Has No Life
Posts: 11388
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:20 am
Custom Title: Dérailleur Énigmatique

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Major Malfunction » Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:49 am

I'm going to see it. You bet! It'll give me a whole long post of complaining material!

I can already tell it's {!#%@} from the trailers.
This being was produced using the same process as other beings, and therefore, may contain traces of nuts.

User avatar
Jeffk 1970
Has More Than 6K Posts
Posts: 6176
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 3:00 am

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Jeffk 1970 » Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:39 am

I couldn't get into the first Blade Runner. I suppose I owe it another viewing.

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4988
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Monster » Mon Oct 09, 2017 5:45 pm

Here's a lovely shot from the movie. The link is to this image, from imdb.com.

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com ... 44_AL_.jpg


joi_40.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Has No Life
Posts: 19695
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Oct 16, 2017 12:36 am

Boobies!
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Has No Life
Posts: 19695
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Oct 16, 2017 12:37 am

Wish Upon: 99th remake of The Monkey's Paw. No surprises.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 26573
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Matthew Ellard » Mon Oct 16, 2017 1:43 am

Blade Runner 2049
Monster wrote:Some parts of the movie didn't make much sense.
Are we allowed to talk about this yet? I saw the film and enjoyed it .........but a lot of it made no sense whatsoever.

What was the point in that woman who gave replicants memories giving a replicant blade runner a memory of the toy horse, in the first place?


The holographic girlfriend was directly stolen from an Arnold Schwarzenegger movie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwTcfwbrNO4

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4988
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Monster » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:06 am

Matthew Ellard wrote:Blade Runner 2049
Monster wrote:Some parts of the movie didn't make much sense.
Are we allowed to talk about this yet?

Just put whatever you want in spoiler tags.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
Major Malfunction
Has No Life
Posts: 11388
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:20 am
Custom Title: Dérailleur Énigmatique

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Major Malfunction » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:01 pm

Matthew Ellard wrote:The holographic girlfriend was directly stolen from an Arnold Schwarzenegger movie.

I'd love a holographic girlfriend! Except mine would be an anime girl.
This being was produced using the same process as other beings, and therefore, may contain traces of nuts.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
True Skeptic
Posts: 10635
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:22 pm

Monster wrote: It's an ok movie. Tom Cruise seems to play the same character in all of his movies, and that is a giant flaming douchebag that is in love with himself.

Thats true of almost "all" movie starts. They just play themselves in different costumes saying different words.........but every Eddie Murphy character "laughs" just like Eddie Murphy.....for the highest example of "not acting." What we like is some quality of the actor that comes thru.

A funny line "if" you meant to disparage the flick...which you don't. So who is it? Gosling is said to underplay his role, and Harrison Ford...just a stock wise cracking hero....not that much in love with himself?

I put Blade Runner right up there in the top 10........most of which are Sci Fi movies. Love all the franchised monster/alien/creature ones... NONE of the Space based ones. Why is that?
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 26573
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Matthew Ellard » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:26 pm

bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote: Love all the franchised monster/alien/creature ones... NONE of the Space based ones. Why is that?
You suffer from Agoraphobia (fear of open spaces) :D

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 26573
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Matthew Ellard » Tue Oct 17, 2017 2:43 am

Monster wrote: Just put whatever you want in spoiler tags.

I just went to a spoilers website and now understand the piece of the plot I didn't understand. It was my error and not the movie's plot.

User avatar
Major Malfunction
Has No Life
Posts: 11388
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:20 am
Custom Title: Dérailleur Énigmatique

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Major Malfunction » Tue Oct 17, 2017 2:45 am

Deckard is a Nexus 7. The new guy is a Nexus 9.

Spoiler:
I haven't seen the movie.
This being was produced using the same process as other beings, and therefore, may contain traces of nuts.

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4988
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Monster » Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:19 am

The Legend of Boggy Creek (1972)

It's a pseudo-documentary made to look like a horror movie. I guess it's a sort of horror documentary. It's about a swamp creature in Fouke, Arkansas.

Surprisingly, this movie is rated G. It has girls screaming, a scary shadowy creature, and some guys shooting at it and getting injured. Doesn't sound too "G" to me.

I don't know why I chose to get this movie from Netflix. I think, but I'm not certain, that I originally heard of this movie from an MST3K facebook group.

Recommendation: Do not watch this movie.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Has No Life
Posts: 19695
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:41 am

Major Malfunction wrote:Deckard is a Nexus 7. The new guy is a Nexus 9.

Spoiler:
I haven't seen the movie.

Deckard isn't a replicant.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
Major Malfunction
Has No Life
Posts: 11388
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 6:20 am
Custom Title: Dérailleur Énigmatique

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Major Malfunction » Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:03 pm

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
Major Malfunction wrote:Deckard is a Nexus 7. The new guy is a Nexus 9.

Deckard isn't a replicant.

I believe it's debatable.
This being was produced using the same process as other beings, and therefore, may contain traces of nuts.

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4988
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Monster » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:34 pm

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
Major Malfunction wrote:Deckard is a Nexus 7. The new guy is a Nexus 9.

Spoiler:
I haven't seen the movie.

Deckard isn't a replicant.


Spoiler:
It's implicitly stated, pretty clearly, that Deckard is a replicant in Blade Runner 2049.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Has No Life
Posts: 19695
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:29 pm

I fell asleep a lot in that one.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Has No Life
Posts: 19695
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: Good/Bad New Moviez

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:31 pm

Monster wrote:
Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
Major Malfunction wrote:Deckard is a Nexus 7. The new guy is a Nexus 9.

Spoiler:
I haven't seen the movie.

Deckard isn't a replicant.


Spoiler:
It's implicitly stated, pretty clearly, that Deckard is a replicant in Blade Runner 2049.

http://www.vulture.com/2017/10/does-bla ... icant.html
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.


Return to “Popular Culture”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest