An almost reasonable debate
- Lausten
- Persistent Poster
- Posts: 3521
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:33 pm
- Location: Northern Minnesota
- Contact:
An almost reasonable debate
Aslan vs Harris
Reza Aslan recently came out with the book Zealot, a modern historical analysis of a very political Jesus. He is very liberal compared to the mainstream of religion in the US. In this debate, he argues for the idea that all ancient scriptures are “encounters with the divine” and should be understood in their historical context with a different meaning of “sacred” than we have today. He does a poor job of it. His protests of Sam Harris get repetitive. To me, he does that because that is all he has. He can complain that Harris is presenting a narrow version of religion, but if he could have broadened it, why didn’t he?
When Aslan does try to explain himself it occasionally bordered on the absurd. He said several times that Harris was completely ignoring cultural context. Then when they were arguing about the Israel situation he said, “before 1948 there were thousands of Jews living alongside their neighbors without any problem at all.” This is worse than a Junior High School level of understanding of Zionism. Unfortunately the moderator cut this off before Sam could say much.
At about 40 minutes in Harris finally gets his say. He says it is not easy to convince a modern person to perform a suicidal act of terrorism. He says Aslan’s conception of religion is “infinitely elastic” allowing any definition that suits the moment. If we can’t ever “call a spade a spade” and call religion on its transgressions then this just gives shelter to literalism. The issue, says Harris, is dogmatism. Religion should not be given immunity to the normal tests of reasonableness.
He says, ”Only in religion do we put a veneer of sanctity over dogmatism… once something is called ‘faith’ it becomes an apparently necessary part of the human experience.”
At an hour and 17, Sam Harris’ strength really shows. He has practiced meditation and is willing to grant that experiences that are called spiritual are real to the person experiencing them. We should discuss these, but not use them as proof for a particular god. As he says, the alternative to dogmatism is a truly open ended unconstrained discourse about the human experience. This should have been a chance for Aslan to give some ground, show a little agreement, but he goes off on a rant saying sarcastically, “science proved spiritual experiences are chemical, so what”. This tells me he is more committed to the dogma than to a better understanding the” human language of the divine”, as he puts it.
Anyway, there’s more, give a listen, tell me if I missed anything.
Reza Aslan recently came out with the book Zealot, a modern historical analysis of a very political Jesus. He is very liberal compared to the mainstream of religion in the US. In this debate, he argues for the idea that all ancient scriptures are “encounters with the divine” and should be understood in their historical context with a different meaning of “sacred” than we have today. He does a poor job of it. His protests of Sam Harris get repetitive. To me, he does that because that is all he has. He can complain that Harris is presenting a narrow version of religion, but if he could have broadened it, why didn’t he?
When Aslan does try to explain himself it occasionally bordered on the absurd. He said several times that Harris was completely ignoring cultural context. Then when they were arguing about the Israel situation he said, “before 1948 there were thousands of Jews living alongside their neighbors without any problem at all.” This is worse than a Junior High School level of understanding of Zionism. Unfortunately the moderator cut this off before Sam could say much.
At about 40 minutes in Harris finally gets his say. He says it is not easy to convince a modern person to perform a suicidal act of terrorism. He says Aslan’s conception of religion is “infinitely elastic” allowing any definition that suits the moment. If we can’t ever “call a spade a spade” and call religion on its transgressions then this just gives shelter to literalism. The issue, says Harris, is dogmatism. Religion should not be given immunity to the normal tests of reasonableness.
He says, ”Only in religion do we put a veneer of sanctity over dogmatism… once something is called ‘faith’ it becomes an apparently necessary part of the human experience.”
At an hour and 17, Sam Harris’ strength really shows. He has practiced meditation and is willing to grant that experiences that are called spiritual are real to the person experiencing them. We should discuss these, but not use them as proof for a particular god. As he says, the alternative to dogmatism is a truly open ended unconstrained discourse about the human experience. This should have been a chance for Aslan to give some ground, show a little agreement, but he goes off on a rant saying sarcastically, “science proved spiritual experiences are chemical, so what”. This tells me he is more committed to the dogma than to a better understanding the” human language of the divine”, as he puts it.
Anyway, there’s more, give a listen, tell me if I missed anything.
A sermon helper that doesn't tell you what to believe: http://www.milepost100.com
- octopus1
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 4893
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:11 pm
- Custom Title: Deep Sea Mollusk
- Location: West of Chester
Re: An almost reasonable debate
No, I don't think you "missed" anything there 
I would suggest perhaps that there was repetition from both sides (Of older arguments, long since made)
Beyond that, it seemed like a fair debate where the scales ultimately tipped in favor of Harris.
Thanks for the link!

I would suggest perhaps that there was repetition from both sides (Of older arguments, long since made)
Beyond that, it seemed like a fair debate where the scales ultimately tipped in favor of Harris.
Thanks for the link!

"On the fence".... Without a cushion....
- Gord
- Obnoxious Weed
- Posts: 30525
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:44 am
- Custom Title: Silent Ork
- Location: Transcona
Re: An almost reasonable debate
Wasn't Aslan the lion in the wardrobe?
"Knowledge grows through infinite timelessness" -- the random fictional Deepak Chopra quote site
"Imagine an ennobling of what could be" -- the New Age BS Generator site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE
"Imagine an ennobling of what could be" -- the New Age BS Generator site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE
- octopus1
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 4893
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:11 pm
- Custom Title: Deep Sea Mollusk
- Location: West of Chester
Re: An almost reasonable debate
Gord wrote:Wasn't Aslan the lion in the wardrobe?

See, I deliberately chose not to go there! But I'm glad that you did, Mr. Gord Pevensie...

"On the fence".... Without a cushion....
- fromthehills
- Has More Than 9K Posts
- Posts: 9890
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:01 am
- Location: Woostone
Re: An almost reasonable debate
Gord wrote:Wasn't Aslan the lion in the wardrobe?
https://www.google.com/search?q=Aslan&o ... e&ie=UTF-8
- Gord
- Obnoxious Weed
- Posts: 30525
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:44 am
- Custom Title: Silent Ork
- Location: Transcona
Re: An almost reasonable debate
I barely ever know what's going on anymore, so I have to ask questions.
"Knowledge grows through infinite timelessness" -- the random fictional Deepak Chopra quote site
"Imagine an ennobling of what could be" -- the New Age BS Generator site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE
"Imagine an ennobling of what could be" -- the New Age BS Generator site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE
- octopus1
- Perpetual Poster
- Posts: 4893
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 11:11 pm
- Custom Title: Deep Sea Mollusk
- Location: West of Chester
Re: An almost reasonable debate
Gord wrote:I barely ever know what's going on anymore, so I have to ask questions.
That's a good policy

"On the fence".... Without a cushion....
- kennyc
- Has No Life
- Posts: 12221
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 11:21 am
- Custom Title: The Dank Side of the Moon
- Location: Denver, CO
Re: An almost reasonable debate
I need a good policy, and cheap, insurance is so darn expensive!
Not even reasonable despite the subject title and Obama's exchanges.
Not even reasonable despite the subject title and Obama's exchanges.
Kenny A. Chaffin
Art Gallery - Photo Gallery - Writing&Poetry - The Bleeding Edge
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama
Art Gallery - Photo Gallery - Writing&Poetry - The Bleeding Edge
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama
- Gord
- Obnoxious Weed
- Posts: 30525
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:44 am
- Custom Title: Silent Ork
- Location: Transcona
Re: An almost reasonable debate
kennyc wrote:I need a good policy, and cheap....
Eat more cheese.
"Knowledge grows through infinite timelessness" -- the random fictional Deepak Chopra quote site
"Imagine an ennobling of what could be" -- the New Age BS Generator site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE
"Imagine an ennobling of what could be" -- the New Age BS Generator site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE
- Austin Harper
- Has More Than 5K Posts
- Posts: 5025
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:22 pm
- Custom Title: Rock Chalk Astrohawk
- Location: Detroit
- Contact:
Re: An almost reasonable debate
Gord wrote:kennyc wrote:I need a good policy, and cheap....
Eat more cheese.
That's always a good choice.
Dum ratio nos ducet, valebimus et multa bene geremus.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest