911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Who else knows what we know, Jerry?
User avatar
Cygnus_X1
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 4:08 am
Location: Middle Of Nowhere

911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby Cygnus_X1 » Mon Oct 03, 2016 4:31 am

I need therapy. For some insane reason I watched a bunch of 'there were no planes on 911' videos...and the worst aspect is not simply that ONE person out there is moron enough to think that way, but that entire legions of dolts actually believe the BS.

The ' nose out' video from Fox...the one where the nose of the plane seems to come out of the other side...seems intriguing at first. But it doesn't take more than a few minutes to debunk it. What is exiting the building is clearly expanding. It can in fact be seen in different shapes in all the 911 footage...and it is pure coincidence that for a split second in one video it just happens to have a shape similar to the plane nose.

But this one piece of footage then goes on to be the basis of an entire cottage industry of ever more loony conspiracy. I mean...the government must have faked all the other 36 videos of the impact, mustn't they. And 10,000 witnesses were all just imagining it. How does one argue with this sort of idiocy ? Should one even bother ?

The worst lunacy is the ( 5 million hits...for fecks sake ) video where some loon claims that a 'ball' hit the WTC, and then develops this lunacy to the point where the 'ball' is a reverse engineered anti-gravity device using alien technology from area 51. And all that based on nothing more than the fact that the CNN footage of the plane was grainy and didn't show the wings ( in fact it does in a few frames ). That is true conspiracy loon mind at work.....end up with something even harder to explain than the official version.
100,000 lemmings can't be wrong.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Has No Life
Posts: 19692
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:16 am

These days conspiracies need video to be "believable". These dates back at least as far as the Waco shoot-out, when armored vehicle hits the compound walls and you "can see flames ejected!" If you freeze the vid at one point it does appear that some kind of flare can be seen. However, running the full sequence shows that a piece of trash happened to blow past the point of convergence, and then goes on. No flame to be seen.

And, of course, there's the Zapruder film.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
True Skeptic
Posts: 10614
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:36 pm

Cygnus_X1 wrote:How does one argue with this sort of idiocy ? Should one even bother ?

You don't. Just smile.... and vacate the area.

But....it is worthwhile to recognize these people work, vote, raise families.....come here to post as well.

They are hoomans, as are we: the family of man. I always stop to examine if "I" have any such fantasies...and I've recognized a few from time to time. ..... In defense...maybe a wistful longing rather than an actual belief...but still, not very sensible if reality is your guide.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
gorgeous
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4205
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby gorgeous » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:36 pm

missile into the pentagon, no plane, no plane in PA field...obvious...no plane parts, no luggage, no bodies... https://youtu.be/Uhvh2A9B-KA
Science Fundamentalism...is exactly what happens when there’s a significant, perceived ideological threat to one’s traditions and identity.

User avatar
gorgeous
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4205
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby gorgeous » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:38 pm

the remote viewers also saw the planes into the towers were remote controlled....stay in denial...
Science Fundamentalism...is exactly what happens when there’s a significant, perceived ideological threat to one’s traditions and identity.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
True Skeptic
Posts: 10614
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:38 pm

----- like I said............
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
gorgeous
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4205
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby gorgeous » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:41 pm

Science Fundamentalism...is exactly what happens when there’s a significant, perceived ideological threat to one’s traditions and identity.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
True Skeptic
Posts: 10614
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:05 pm

What size should the pieces be gorgeous?
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Has No Life
Posts: 19692
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:11 am
Custom Title: Deadly but evil.

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:05 pm

"Gorgeous", you are very tedious.
Chachacha wrote:"Oh, thweet mythtery of wife, at waft I've found you!"

WWII Resources. Primary sources.
The Myths of Pearl Harbor. Demythologizing the attack.
Hyperwar. Hypertext history of the Second World War.
The greatest place to work in the entire United States.

User avatar
gorgeous
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4205
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby gorgeous » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:19 pm

bigger than a phone book ...that's for sure...see any plane crash site...luggage , wings, bodies, engines are visible on a much bigger site... like this ----- https://youtu.be/x36z3Egilb4
Science Fundamentalism...is exactly what happens when there’s a significant, perceived ideological threat to one’s traditions and identity.

User avatar
gorgeous
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4205
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby gorgeous » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:27 pm

was likely an air bomb at Pa field...no plane...
Science Fundamentalism...is exactly what happens when there’s a significant, perceived ideological threat to one’s traditions and identity.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
True Skeptic
Posts: 10614
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:55 pm

I've never look at this no plane conspiracy...... so yes, most plane crashes leave parts behind. .... but I don't see why all crashes must do so. I assume the engine turbine blades were mostly found? I recall the Black Box was recovered as we had recordings of the cockpit being broken into?

What caused the big rut in Shanksville?

Where did all the ticketed people go????

You know....you can't "hang" a fraud on one isolated fact............and I'll bet without any research at all that larger parts were found...just not in the first 5 minutes???

G: what is the hardest evidence against the crash being faked?
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
gorgeous
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4205
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby gorgeous » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:16 pm

reporters who were there first said no plane parts were seen...bomb made rut.....were the 'ticketed people' in on it or murdered? FBI and others reported the calls on the planes never happened...faked... Ted Olson's Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11: Three ...



www.globalresearch.ca/ted-olson-s-repor ... 11.../8514


Apr 1, 2008 - 9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call ... alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 ...
Science Fundamentalism...is exactly what happens when there’s a significant, perceived ideological threat to one’s traditions and identity.

User avatar
gorgeous
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4205
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby gorgeous » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:24 pm

I remember seeing the mom of the 'let's roll' guy on every single tv channel sobbing.... crisis actress?...I thought then it was abnormal and a hoax that she needed to do back to back interviews and be on every channel like she was selling her role as grieving mom... ------ https://youtu.be/ffCaH5L5l40
Science Fundamentalism...is exactly what happens when there’s a significant, perceived ideological threat to one’s traditions and identity.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
True Skeptic
Posts: 10614
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:41 pm

gorgeous wrote:reporters who were there first said no plane parts were seen/// of course not, that has already been agreed to

...bomb made rut...../// bombs don't make ruts

were the 'ticketed people' in on it or murdered? /// In on it for grins...or what??? Life long hide and seeks??? Silly.

FBI and others reported the calls on the planes never happened...faked... /// Link? aka: I don't believe you.

Ted Olson's Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11: Three ...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ted-olson- ... 11.../8514 /// Ok....lets assume no phone call: so what??? Its the mountain, or the rut, of evidence otherwise.


Apr 1, 2008 - 9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call ... alleged calls from Barbara Olson, there is no evidence that Flight 77 ...
/// fog of war. Mountain of evidence vs.... bad reporting on phone call. See the lack of balance?

Second time: what is the strongest evidence in your mind against a fraudulent plane crash?
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
gorgeous
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4205
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby gorgeous » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:44 pm

the small crash site..no plane, bodies, luggage plane parts....duhhh........
Science Fundamentalism...is exactly what happens when there’s a significant, perceived ideological threat to one’s traditions and identity.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
True Skeptic
Posts: 10614
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:52 pm

No Gorgeous: focus. You give the strongest evidence IN FAVOR OF a fake plane crash. I'm asking for the opposite. aka: how much do you really know about the issue as opposed to just being a tool.

Third time..... read for what it clearly says: what is the strongest evidence AGAINST this being a faked crash?
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
True Skeptic
Posts: 10614
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:58 pm

"By December 19, 2001, “the remains of the 40 passengers and crew, and, by process of elimination, the four hijackers” had all been identified. (Steve Levin, “Flight 93 victims’ effects to go back to families,” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 12/30/2001)"

Plane parts too. Gorgeous: you simply ignore the refutation of the LIE you choose to believe.
http://www.secretsofthefed.com/shanksvi ... rash-site/

It appears to me you rely on "early reports" and totally ignore follow up actual investigation.

Silly.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
gorgeous
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4205
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby gorgeous » Mon Oct 03, 2016 3:05 pm

planted plane parts....propaganda article...
Science Fundamentalism...is exactly what happens when there’s a significant, perceived ideological threat to one’s traditions and identity.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
True Skeptic
Posts: 10614
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Oct 03, 2016 3:09 pm

Link....and btw...."planted plane parts" sounds like evidence in favor of a fraud. Propaganda doesn't even make sense.

G: can you understand "anything" other than your set knee jerk response? So far: no... you can't. Rather humorous. Intellectually lazy conspiracy theorists...can't support/argue their own position, all you can do is howl your complaint.

Sucks to be you. I'm done. You got NOTHING.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
Monster
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:57 pm
Location: Tarrytown, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby Monster » Mon Oct 03, 2016 3:43 pm

Well, gorgeous, you've convinced me with your videos.
Listening twice as much as you speak is a sign of wisdom.

User avatar
gorgeous
Perpetual Poster
Posts: 4205
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby gorgeous » Mon Oct 03, 2016 9:46 pm

yes, the govt puts out propaganda and now openly promote it... CIA Will Now Openly Propagandize Americans » Alex Jones' Infowars ...



www.infowars.com/cia-will-now-openly-pr ... e-americ...



Alex Jones

Jul 15, 2013 - ... Act “reformed” this month allowing CIA to disseminate propaganda .... of the war effort because the CIA hands were tied by legal restriction.
Science Fundamentalism...is exactly what happens when there’s a significant, perceived ideological threat to one’s traditions and identity.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 26561
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby Matthew Ellard » Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:13 am

gorgeous wrote:the remote viewers also saw the planes into the towers were remote controlled....stay in denial...
Gorgeous? Be a good bloke and explain how the remote viewers knew the planes were remote controlled?

Did the planes have huge signs painted on them saying "Remote Controlled"?
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 26561
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby Matthew Ellard » Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:16 am

gorgeous wrote:planted plane parts....propaganda article...
Gorgeous? Be a good bloke and explain to us why your remote viewers are unable to see who planted the plane parts and unable to say when these same people planted the plane parts?

Why are the remote viewers failing to do this?
:lol:

User avatar
Cygnus_X1
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 4:08 am
Location: Middle Of Nowhere

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby Cygnus_X1 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 12:34 pm

Another big myth is the that of the woman allegedly standing in the hole left by the first plane. It 'looks' like a woman standing there....only until you realise that the legs don't look at all right. And then it hit me, the legs are not legs at all...they are actually pieces of the external cladding of the WTC. This is VERY clear in one of the photos...where you can clearly see that the woman's 'leg' is simply the upward extension of the aluminium cladding from the floor below. There is no woman....the entire thing is pareidolia.
100,000 lemmings can't be wrong.

User avatar
scrmbldggs
Has No Life
Posts: 19657
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 7:55 am
Custom Title: something
Location: sees Maria Frigoris from its house!

Re: 911 'No Planets' Lunacy

Postby scrmbldggs » Thu Oct 06, 2016 12:39 am

Matthew Ellard wrote:
gorgeous wrote:planted plane parts....propaganda article...
Gorgeous? Be a good bloke and explain to us why your remote viewers are unable to see who planted the plane parts and unable to say when these same people planted the plane parts?

Why are the remote viewers failing to do this?
:lol:

Fairly plain to see. Their lunacy does not allow them to distinguish between the parts of the plains and planes not planted but painted on the planet. Duh...
Hi, Io the lurker.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 26561
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: 911 'No Planes' Lunacy

Postby Matthew Ellard » Thu Oct 06, 2016 12:52 am

gorgeous wrote:yes, the govt puts out propaganda and now openly promote it... CIA Will Now Openly Propagandize Americans » Alex Jones' Infowars ...
You are the dumbest of the dumb... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The US Information and Educational Exchange Act (1948) (Smith–Mundt Act) was modified in 2013.....
.......allowing for materials produced by the State Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) to be released within U.S. borders for the Archivist of the United States

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr4310/text

It has nothing to do with the CIA, you complete idiot!

User avatar
OlegTheBatty
True Skeptic
Posts: 10420
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:35 pm
Custom Title: Uppity Atheist

Re: 911 'No Planets' Lunacy

Postby OlegTheBatty » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:11 am

scrmbldggs wrote:
Matthew Ellard wrote:
gorgeous wrote:planted plane parts....propaganda article...
Gorgeous? Be a good bloke and explain to us why your remote viewers are unable to see who planted the plane parts and unable to say when these same people planted the plane parts?

Why are the remote viewers failing to do this?
:lol:

Fairly plain to see. Their lunacy does not allow them to distinguish between the parts of the plains and planes not planted but painted on the planet. Duh...

If they planted plane trees, the seeds could be considered plane parts. And, as time passes, it gets easier and easier to find the planes, and their parts.
. . . with the satisfied air of a man who thinks he has an idea of his own because he has commented on the idea of another . . . - Alexandre Dumas 'The Count of Monte Cristo"

There is no statement so absurd that it has not been uttered by some philosopher. - Cicero

User avatar
scrmbldggs
Has No Life
Posts: 19657
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 7:55 am
Custom Title: something
Location: sees Maria Frigoris from its house!

Re: 911 'No Planets' Lunacy

Postby scrmbldggs » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:43 am

OlegTheBatty wrote:
scrmbldggs wrote:
Matthew Ellard wrote:
gorgeous wrote:planted plane parts....propaganda article...
Gorgeous? Be a good bloke and explain to us why your remote viewers are unable to see who planted the plane parts and unable to say when these same people planted the plane parts?

Why are the remote viewers failing to do this?
:lol:

Fairly plain to see. Their lunacy does not allow them to distinguish between the parts of the plains and planes not planted but painted on the planet. Duh...

If they planted plane trees, the seeds could be considered plane parts. And, as time passes, it gets easier and easier to find the planes, and their parts.


:cool: page. Thanks. :-D
Hi, Io the lurker.


Return to “Conspiracies”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest