Defending Reincarnation

PSI, Mediums, Ghosts, UFOs, Things That Go Bump In The Night
bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 11662
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Jan 01, 2018 4:46 pm

Aztexan wrote:If anyone is dumb enough to believe the body and self are two distinct entities, then couldn't murderers claim that they didn't kill their victims, they just freed them from their physical constraints?


States/Government have never taken that position....well, maybe a few regarding their enemies?........but its a popular theme among family members killing one another. In modern times, even with the express agreement and submission by the one freed (Death with Dignity).

The body and the self are two distinct entities......the self dependent on the body but very separate from it.

distinct: not alike; different in nature or quality. Who would disagree?
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
Poodle
Has More Than 8K Posts
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:12 pm
Custom Title: Regular sleeper
Location: NE corner of my living room

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Poodle » Mon Jan 01, 2018 4:50 pm

:wave: Me, sir

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 11662
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Jan 01, 2018 5:02 pm

Poodle wrote::wave: Me, sir
===>Go Ahead.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
Poodle
Has More Than 8K Posts
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:12 pm
Custom Title: Regular sleeper
Location: NE corner of my living room

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Poodle » Mon Jan 01, 2018 5:32 pm

Well, we could start here, bobbo ...

"The body and the self are two distinct entities......the self dependent on the body but very separate from it."

I don't think that's true. Can you provide evidence of its truth?

Aztexan
King of the Limericks
King of the Limericks
Posts: 8116
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:39 pm

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Aztexan » Mon Jan 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Is this an issue of semantics? The self being different from the brain being different from the mind being different from the soul?
My brain could technically function outside my body, but my brain is part of my body and it wouldn't be me anyways.
trump is literally a piece of {!#%@}.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 11662
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Jan 01, 2018 6:02 pm

Poodle wrote:Well, we could start here, bobbo ...

"The body and the self are two distinct entities......the self dependent on the body but very separate from it."

I don't think that's true. Can you provide evidence of its truth?

Well........its just a very direct application of the DEFINITION of self.......and perhaps a lack of recognition on your part of what dependent means?

distinct: not alike; different in nature or quality. Who would disagree? //// The body is physical, the self is not physical but is a mental state completely not physical at all. Surely that is different in nature and quality.

dependent: one not existing without some other. Here, the body can exist without the mind/self but not contra. Another distinction.

...Az: no semantics at all. Just simple definitions. Semantics applying at a different level.......but I won't say distinct, because that would be word play.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

Confidencia
Poster
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 9:43 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Confidencia » Mon Jan 01, 2018 6:24 pm

Poodle wrote:
Confidencia wrote:
Matthew Ellard wrote:
Confidencia wrote:Because I exist yet I do not.
Set fire to yourself. We will video you screaming. See how easy science is to do? :lol:

Confidencia Movie.jpg

The reaction of the body to an impact merely proves something has happened to the body, not to me. The body functions by itself, if you don't believe me try to stop the feces from coming out of your mouth or arshole for that matter. :lol: :mrgreen:


And if you really believe that, con, go jump off a high cliff. Report back here with your observations after the event. With pics, of course.


There is the fact of feeling to consider. Would you put your hands in the fire knowing you are going to get burnt? You seem to be forgetting the aspect of suffering poodle. Whatever the body goes through it is going to be felt by the consciousness - unfortunately as long as the body is in view it's pain and suffering will be too.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 11662
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Jan 01, 2018 6:31 pm

So...you exist. No "not" about it.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
Poodle
Has More Than 8K Posts
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:12 pm
Custom Title: Regular sleeper
Location: NE corner of my living room

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Poodle » Mon Jan 01, 2018 6:33 pm

There is, indeed, the fact of feeling to consider, Confidencia. Thank goodness you've realised that before you actually claimed your immunity to the general effects of living in a universe.
Hypocritical fraud.

Confidencia
Poster
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 9:43 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Confidencia » Mon Jan 01, 2018 7:26 pm

Aztexan wrote:If anyone is dumb enough to believe the body and self are two distinct entities, then couldn't murderers claim that they didn't kill their victims, they just freed them from their physical constraints?


You could regardless but I doubt whether society would let you get away with it.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 11662
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Jan 01, 2018 7:35 pm

Con: I note you choose to avoid the issue that matters and simply repeat what everyone has already agreed to.

You wont progress that way. Waste of your time here on Earth...........don't ya think?
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

Confidencia
Poster
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 9:43 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Confidencia » Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:06 pm

Poodle wrote:There is, indeed, the fact of feeling to consider, Confidencia. Thank goodness you've realised that before you actually claimed your immunity to the general effects of living in a universe.
Hypocritical fraud.


The general effects of the universe are relative to the absolute. And since the source of consciousness cannot be an object in consciousness it also makes it untouchable as well as immune.

Confidencia
Poster
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 9:43 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Confidencia » Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:16 pm

bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:Con: I note you choose to avoid the issue that matters and simply repeat what everyone has already agreed to.

You wont progress that way. Waste of your time here on Earth...........don't ya think?


The issue that matters has not even been touched, we'll need to get beyond the elementary level before we can start there. This has always been the problem, trying to get you skeptics to understand a direct question, more so to respond with a direct answer is more than the jobs worth. But there's always some fun to be had during the process, that's what keeps me here. 8-)

Confidencia
Poster
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 9:43 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Confidencia » Mon Jan 01, 2018 8:23 pm

bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:So...you exist. No "not" about it.

From the perspective of the mind I exist yet I do not. In reality what does it matter? Existence relates to some-thing. No-thing exists in reality.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 27003
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Matthew Ellard » Mon Jan 01, 2018 9:27 pm

Confidencia wrote: From the perspective of the mind I exist yet I do not. In reality what does it matter?


When we set fire to you and you start screaming,.......... You will quickly drop your confused religious bull-shit. :D

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 11662
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Mon Jan 01, 2018 11:11 pm

What Matt said.

Get real.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

Confidencia
Poster
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 9:43 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Confidencia » Tue Jan 02, 2018 12:48 am

Matthew Ellard wrote:
Confidencia wrote: From the perspective of the mind I exist yet I do not. In reality what does it matter?


When we set fire to you and you start screaming,.......... You will quickly drop your confused religious bull-shit. :D


:lol: I doubt whether you'd have the bottle to say boo to a goose much less setting anybody alight. Little man syndrome is written all over your posts. :lol:

User avatar
Cadmusteeth
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1009
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:43 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Cadmusteeth » Tue Jan 02, 2018 1:03 am

Little men fit into tight places.

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 7K Posts
Posts: 7902
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby TJrandom » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:03 am

Louisa would be proud of Matthew.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 27003
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Matthew Ellard » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:43 am

Confidencia wrote: I exist yet I do not. In reality what does it matter?
Matthew Ellard wrote:When we set fire to you and you start screaming,.......... You will quickly drop your confused religious bull-shit. :D
Confidencia wrote: I doubt whether you'd have the bottle to say boo to a goose much less setting anybody alight.
Well it would certainly be more exciting than your hippy plan to bore us to death with religious nonsense. :lol:

Aztexan
King of the Limericks
King of the Limericks
Posts: 8116
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:39 pm

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Aztexan » Tue Jan 02, 2018 5:43 am

Confidencia wrote:
Aztexan wrote:If anyone is dumb enough to believe the body and self are two distinct entities, then couldn't murderers claim that they didn't kill their victims, they just freed them from their physical constraints?


You could regardless but I doubt whether society would let you get away with it.


Is that a challenge?
trump is literally a piece of {!#%@}.

Confidencia
Poster
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 9:43 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Confidencia » Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:56 am

Cadmusteeth wrote:Little men fit into tight places.


You kid me not cad, wherever ellard seems to raise his head you can bet your bottom dollar he's just crawled out of somebody's chocolate star fish :lol: :lol: :lol: hence the reason why he's so ignorant. He hardly sees the light of day :lol:

Confidencia
Poster
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 9:43 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Confidencia » Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:57 am

Aztexan wrote:
Confidencia wrote:
Aztexan wrote:If anyone is dumb enough to believe the body and self are two distinct entities, then couldn't murderers claim that they didn't kill their victims, they just freed them from their physical constraints?


You could regardless but I doubt whether society would let you get away with it.


Is that a challenge?


No it's a fact

Confidencia
Poster
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 9:43 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Confidencia » Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:59 am

Matthew Ellard wrote:
Confidencia wrote: I exist yet I do not. In reality what does it matter?
Matthew Ellard wrote:When we set fire to you and you start screaming,.......... You will quickly drop your confused religious bull-shit. :D
Confidencia wrote: I doubt whether you'd have the bottle to say boo to a goose much less setting anybody alight.
Well it would certainly be more exciting than your hippy plan to bore us to death with religious nonsense. :lol:


Such is the nature of the little man that even the smallest of things cause a whorl of excitement in his tiny little mind.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 27003
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Matthew Ellard » Tue Jan 02, 2018 9:10 pm

Matthew Ellard wrote:Well it would certainly be more exciting than your hippy plan to bore us to death with religious nonsense. :lol:
Confidencia AKA Shaka AKA Clarifyit4me wrote: Such is the nature of the little man that even the smallest of things cause a whorl of excitement in his tiny little mind.


Poor Poor Shaka, You changed your forum name five times and still everyone laughs at your repetitive drivel. :lol:

Dubious
New Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 6:08 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Dubious » Wed Jan 03, 2018 4:32 am

If reincarnation exists it can only be as something provided by nature for purposes of its own. So again what would that be above and beyond all the nonsensical reasons supplied by the likes of Buddhism which amount to silliness incarnate.

User avatar
Poodle
Has More Than 8K Posts
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:12 pm
Custom Title: Regular sleeper
Location: NE corner of my living room

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Poodle » Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:56 am

Chocolate star fish?
Wossat, then?

Aztexan
King of the Limericks
King of the Limericks
Posts: 8116
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:39 pm

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Aztexan » Wed Jan 03, 2018 10:35 am

Apparently he wants to get into a pissing match with Matthew "Horsecock" Ellard.
trump is literally a piece of {!#%@}.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 27003
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Matthew Ellard » Wed Jan 03, 2018 9:03 pm

Aztexan wrote:Apparently he wants to get into a pissing match with Matthew "Horsecock" Ellard.

I don't think so. Shaka is a failed Advaita teacher in the UK. He's just old and senile and is trolling from loneliness.

MindGem
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2018 1:17 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby MindGem » Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:53 pm

I would suggest that you picked a smaller subject to debate, something you could grasp, wrap your head around before you start a really big question like afterlife.

But if you insist and find it interesting to swap ideas around then Start with the definition. You can't all just yell out things if you have two separate ideas of what incarnation is in detail. Set up some rules that you both agree upon, then it gets more interesting to play.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 27003
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Matthew Ellard » Sun Jan 14, 2018 1:23 am

MindGem wrote:But if you insist and find it interesting to swap ideas around then Start with the definition. You can't all just yell out things if you have two separate ideas of what incarnation is in detail. Set up some rules that you both agree upon, then it gets more interesting to play.


This is a science based forum and thus follows the scientific method. That means anyone wishing to debate reincarnation, as real, has to set out their hypothesis for reincarnation and that hypothesis must be detailed and falsifiable.

Sadly, we have lots of religious troll who insist on posting gibberish simply to get attention for their religion. They are easy to spot because they refuse the ever write down a hypothesis for their religious claims.

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2397
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Nikki Nyx » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:15 pm

MindGem wrote:But if you insist and find it interesting to swap ideas around then Start with the definition. You can't all just yell out things if you have two separate ideas of what incarnation is in detail. Set up some rules that you both agree upon, then it gets more interesting to play.
Nearly all All the wooists who come in here either fail or refuse to define their terms, formulate a hypothesis, and provide evidence for it. They tend to be overly attached to anecdotal data that conforms with their biases. But they're fun to play with! :duel: :mrgreen:
What are the facts? Again and again and again-what are the facts? Shun wishful thinking, ignore divine revelation, forget what “the stars foretell,” avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors think, never mind the unguessable “verdict of history”--what are the facts, and to how many decimal places? You pilot always into an unknown future; facts are your single clue. Get the facts!
—Lazarus Long, from Time Enough for Love, by Robert A. Heinlein

User avatar
Gord
Real Skeptic
Posts: 29751
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:44 am
Custom Title: Silent Ork
Location: Transcona

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Gord » Mon Jan 15, 2018 12:35 am

Death fascinates a symphony of belonging. The web of life undertakes innumerable bliss. The mind relies on new brains. The secret of the universe is entangled in unique energy. Our consciousness drives essential belonging. (Making tea depends on unparalleled happiness.) Each of us is reborn in the barrier of knowledge.
"Knowledge grows through infinite timelessness" -- the random fictional Deepak Chopra quote site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 7K Posts
Posts: 7902
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby TJrandom » Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:45 am

Gord wrote:Death fascinates a symphony of belonging. The web of life undertakes innumerable bliss. The mind relies on new brains. The secret of the universe is entangled in unique energy. Our consciousness drives essential belonging. (Making tea depends on unparalleled happiness.) Each of us is reborn in the barrier of knowledge.


The cosmos is awash in consciousness – each replete with infinite entities. Lo, behold the one we all are, asking questions knowing the answers span the duel universes of the mental, born of truth, eternal death and infinite consciousness.

User avatar
Cadmusteeth
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1009
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:43 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Cadmusteeth » Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:14 pm

“Let there be no Genesis, for beginnings are false and I am a consummate liar.”
-???

User avatar
Gord
Real Skeptic
Posts: 29751
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:44 am
Custom Title: Silent Ork
Location: Transcona

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Gord » Mon Jan 15, 2018 11:27 pm

TJrandom wrote:
Gord wrote:Death fascinates a symphony of belonging. The web of life undertakes innumerable bliss. The mind relies on new brains. The secret of the universe is entangled in unique energy. Our consciousness drives essential belonging. (Making tea depends on unparalleled happiness.) Each of us is reborn in the barrier of knowledge.

The cosmos is awash in consciousness – each replete with infinite entities. Lo, behold the one we all are, asking questions knowing the answers span the duel universes of the mental, born of truth, eternal death and infinite consciousness.

:shock: Which random generator did you use? It looks much better than the one I used!







...oh, wait, yours said "duel" instead of "dual". Never mind. It's broken. :P
"Knowledge grows through infinite timelessness" -- the random fictional Deepak Chopra quote site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 7K Posts
Posts: 7902
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby TJrandom » Tue Jan 16, 2018 5:21 am

Gord wrote:
TJrandom wrote:
Gord wrote:Death fascinates a symphony of belonging. The web of life undertakes innumerable bliss. The mind relies on new brains. The secret of the universe is entangled in unique energy. Our consciousness drives essential belonging. (Making tea depends on unparalleled happiness.) Each of us is reborn in the barrier of knowledge.

The cosmos is awash in consciousness – each replete with infinite entities. Lo, behold the one we all are, asking questions knowing the answers span the duel universes of the mental, born of truth, eternal death and infinite consciousness.

:shock: Which random generator did you use? It looks much better than the one I used!




...oh, wait, yours said "duel" instead of "dual". Never mind. It's broken. :P


I just went back thru some of Confidencia`s word salads and picked up a few wordz - f### if I know what it means. Duel, dual, do all - is there a difference?

User avatar
Gord
Real Skeptic
Posts: 29751
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:44 am
Custom Title: Silent Ork
Location: Transcona

Re: Defending Reincarnation

Postby Gord » Wed Jan 17, 2018 1:49 am

If there's a difference, I refuse to do all dual duels.
"Knowledge grows through infinite timelessness" -- the random fictional Deepak Chopra quote site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE


Return to “UFOs, Cryptozoology, and The Paranormal”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests