Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

A skeptical look at medical practices
User avatar
Cadmusteeth
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:43 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Cadmusteeth » Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:24 pm

“Back in the bad old days of autism they thought it was caused by “refrigerator mothers”.

Well, right now, some psychiatrists have decided that the best treatment for autism is something not that far removed from sticking them in a refrigerator – literally. Enter “Le Packing”, which is the target of an unprecedented consensus statement just out from a list of 18 big-name autism experts (available free here).
This alleged therapy consists of wrapping the patient (wearing only underclothes or naked in the case of young children) several times a week during weeks or months in towels soaked in cold water (10°C to 15°C). The individual is wrapped with blankets to help the body warm up in a process lasting 45 minutes, during which time the child or adolescent is accompanied by two to four staff persons.
The alleged goal of this technique is to “allow the child to rid him- or herself progressively of its pathological defense mechanisms against archaic anxieties,” by achieving “a greater perception and integration of the body, and a growing sense of containment.”“

Continues here:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuro ... 2r5naRMGEf

User avatar
landrew
Has More Than 7K Posts
Posts: 7935
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:51 am

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby landrew » Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:15 pm

Sorta like a different kinda shock treatment then?
The job of a skeptic is to investigate the unexplained; not to explain the uninvestigated.

User avatar
OlegTheBatty
Has No Life
Posts: 11153
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:35 pm
Custom Title: Uppity Atheist

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby OlegTheBatty » Wed Aug 08, 2018 5:45 pm

Laughter Torture is the best medicine.
. . . with the satisfied air of a man who thinks he has an idea of his own because he has commented on the idea of another . . . - Alexandre Dumas 'The Count of Monte Cristo"

There is no statement so absurd that it has not been uttered by some philosopher. - Cicero

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 9K Posts
Posts: 9527
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby TJrandom » Sat Aug 11, 2018 10:28 pm

How many have died?

User avatar
Wordbird
Poster
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 8:03 pm

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Wordbird » Sun Aug 12, 2018 6:50 pm

How many come in a pack, how much does it cost, and how long does it keep? Just the 45 minutes, or longer if you refrigerate it? Also, do you just have to refrigerate after opening, or do you have to pop it in the fridge as soon as you get it?

(I am actually not dismissing out of hand that this kind of torture could desensitise the children to their own autism along with the torture.)

User avatar
Cadmusteeth
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:43 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Cadmusteeth » Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:17 am

It's among the worst kinds of psudoscience. No one in the scientific community condones this as an actual science. (Read the article if you don't want to take my word for it.)

User avatar
landrew
Has More Than 7K Posts
Posts: 7935
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:51 am

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby landrew » Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:23 am

Cadmusteeth wrote:It's among the worst kinds of psudoscience. No one in the scientific community condones this as an actual science. (Read the article if you don't want to take my word for it.)

But what if it actually works? Trash it anyway?
The job of a skeptic is to investigate the unexplained; not to explain the uninvestigated.

User avatar
Wordbird
Poster
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 8:03 pm

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Wordbird » Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:23 am

Honestly, sometimes you gotta throw {!#%@} at the wall until something sticks.

No one else has cured autism. I support their right to try.

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 9K Posts
Posts: 9527
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby TJrandom » Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:07 am

Wordbird wrote:Honestly, sometimes you gotta throw {!#%@} at the wall until something sticks.

No one else has cured autism. I support their right to try.


Agreed - just so long as those who try, but kill their kids in the process, get dropped out of airliners at 10,000 feet - preferably over the city in which they lived, for all to see. (Or some such...)

User avatar
Cadmusteeth
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:43 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Cadmusteeth » Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:44 pm

landrew wrote:
Cadmusteeth wrote:It's among the worst kinds of psudoscience. No one in the scientific community condones this as an actual science. (Read the article if you don't want to take my word for it.)

But what if it actually works? Trash it anyway?

Read the dang article. Patients who received that treatment developed heart problems. Does that sound like it works?

User avatar
landrew
Has More Than 7K Posts
Posts: 7935
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:51 am

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby landrew » Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:23 pm

Cadmusteeth wrote:
landrew wrote:
Cadmusteeth wrote:It's among the worst kinds of psudoscience. No one in the scientific community condones this as an actual science. (Read the article if you don't want to take my word for it.)

But what if it actually works? Trash it anyway?

Read the dang article. Patients who received that treatment developed heart problems. Does that sound like it works?

More abstractly; if the treatment is deemed the lesser of two evils by some doctors, should it still be condemned?
The job of a skeptic is to investigate the unexplained; not to explain the uninvestigated.

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 9K Posts
Posts: 9527
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby TJrandom » Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:49 pm

The lesser of what other evil? A refusal to eat can be treated with an IV drip. Self mutilation by gloves or tethers in the worst cases. Having read the article, it seems to me that administration of punishment is at the core - eat or we will package you again. Wasn`t it Silence of the Lambs - rub the lotion on the skin or you will get the hose again?

Where are the medical trials and results on this?

User avatar
landrew
Has More Than 7K Posts
Posts: 7935
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:51 am

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby landrew » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:11 pm

TJrandom wrote:The lesser of what other evil? A refusal to eat can be treated with an IV drip. Self mutilation by gloves or tethers in the worst cases. Having read the article, it seems to me that administration of punishment is at the core - eat or we will package you again. Wasn`t it Silence of the Lambs - rub the lotion on the skin or you will get the hose again?

Where are the medical trials and results on this?

You're not understanding this. Every treatment has side effects, sometimes quite severe, yet they are still used.
The job of a skeptic is to investigate the unexplained; not to explain the uninvestigated.

User avatar
Cadmusteeth
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:43 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Cadmusteeth » Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:44 pm

Did you read the article?

User avatar
landrew
Has More Than 7K Posts
Posts: 7935
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:51 am

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby landrew » Mon Aug 13, 2018 11:18 pm

Cadmusteeth wrote:Did you read the article?

Twice in fact; a second time to placate your concerns.
I am not a supporter nor a detractor. I am engaging in the debate by bringing out an argument from a point of view not yet discussed.
Now, please get back to the debate and stop worrying about what I read.
The job of a skeptic is to investigate the unexplained; not to explain the uninvestigated.

User avatar
Cadmusteeth
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:43 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Cadmusteeth » Tue Aug 14, 2018 12:33 am

landrew wrote:
Cadmusteeth wrote:
landrew wrote:
Cadmusteeth wrote:It's among the worst kinds of psudoscience. No one in the scientific community condones this as an actual science. (Read the article if you don't want to take my word for it.)

But what if it actually works? Trash it anyway?

Read the dang article. Patients who received that treatment developed heart problems. Does that sound like it works?

More abstractly; if the treatment is deemed the lesser of two evils by some doctors, should it still be condemned?

If it doesn’t hold up to scrutiny in the medical community then what does it matter what those few doctors think?

We have reached the consensus that practitioners and families around the world should consider this approach unethical. Furthermore, this “therapy” ignores current knowledge about autism spectrum disorders; goes against evidence-based practice…and, in our view, poses a risk of preventing these children and adolescents from accessing their basic human rights to health and education.

User avatar
Wordbird
Poster
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 8:03 pm

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Wordbird » Tue Aug 14, 2018 2:32 am

landrew wrote:More abstractly; if the treatment is deemed the lesser of two evils by some doctors, should it still be condemned?


That's a really good question. Ideally since the value of any side effect you put on the plate is subjective, the subject should decide if the treatment is worth it to him.

But when you're dealing with human beings who aren't capable of making those decisions, you can either fully saddle the parent with the responsibility, meaning she won't get punished even if the kid dies, or you can try to determine some objective standard of how much the patient was helped or harmed, and if the benefit was "worth it" or not.

User avatar
landrew
Has More Than 7K Posts
Posts: 7935
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:51 am

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby landrew » Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:07 am

Wordbird wrote:
landrew wrote:More abstractly; if the treatment is deemed the lesser of two evils by some doctors, should it still be condemned?


That's a really good question. Ideally since the value of any side effect you put on the plate is subjective, the subject should decide if the treatment is worth it to him.

But when you're dealing with human beings who aren't capable of making those decisions, you can either fully saddle the parent with the responsibility, meaning she won't get punished even if the kid dies, or you can try to determine some objective standard of how much the patient was helped or harmed, and if the benefit was "worth it" or not.

A friend of mine had a severely debilitating form of rheumatoid arthritis. Without treatment, he was reduced to writhing in pain on the floor, and it was deforming his body.
He was offered a drug which promised to eliminate all the negative effects of the disease, but he was warned that could significantly increase his risk of contracting leukemia. He signed the papers and took the treatments at his own risk. He had about 5 good years, free of the disease almost entirely, but one day a few years ago he went for a checkup and he was diagnosed with a rapid form of leukemia. He was dead within 3 weeks.
The job of a skeptic is to investigate the unexplained; not to explain the uninvestigated.

User avatar
Wordbird
Poster
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 8:03 pm

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Wordbird » Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:18 am

landrew wrote:He was offered a drug which promised to eliminate all the negative effects of the disease, but he was warned that could significantly increase his risk of contracting leukemia. He signed the papers and took the treatments at his own risk. He had about 5 good years, free of the disease almost entirely, but one day a few years ago he went for a checkup and he was diagnosed with a rapid form of leukemia. He was dead within 3 weeks.


And we say this is okay because the patient accepted the risk. It would even be okay if he'd caught hyper-leukemia and somehow melted into white blood cell goop the very next day. His hand spun the Russian Roulette wheel.

Severely autistic kids can't spin the wheel. So how do we handle these sorts of risks? How do we objectively decide what's best for another human being?

In reality, we make them wards of their parents. We let the parents decide. The parents can make a mistake, though, just like your friend could have.

To me, you have to let the parent make any mistake if you're going to saddle them with that burden - the burden of being responsible for someone who can't be responsible for themself.

If you prove negligence, that's one thing - perhaps the parent wanted to pack little Screamin' Demon in the freezer to get rid of it and there's some evidence of this - but if you're going to make the parent the moral agent for Billy's welfare, you have to give them the same right to make a mistake or miscalculate as you'd give Billy if he was capable.

User avatar
TJrandom
Has More Than 9K Posts
Posts: 9527
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:55 am
Location: Pacific coast outside of Tokyo bay.
Contact:

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby TJrandom » Tue Aug 14, 2018 10:34 am

I don`t believe the article claimed, or the treatment produced, any objectively identified improvements. Hence I asked about trials - controlled, with results quantified. If for example, this lead to 4 out of 5 no longer being autistic (or even some lesser improvement), but one out of five died, I would be OK with that. But where the benefit appears to be entirely subjective and only in the minds of the practitioners, then I`d ban it pending a scientific study/trial.

User avatar
psychiatry is a scam
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1375
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:23 am

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby psychiatry is a scam » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:09 am

autism is just a fancy word for weak and stupid .
you cant fix stupid .
you can rob desperate parents tho

User avatar
psychiatry is a scam
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1375
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:23 am

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby psychiatry is a scam » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am

psychiatry is a scam wrote:autism is just a fancy word for weak and stupid .
you cant fix stupid .
you can rob desperate parents tho



I know this because that is what I am

I hear that - you cant fix stupid - a lot

User avatar
Wordbird
Poster
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 8:03 pm

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Wordbird » Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:08 am

psychiatry is a scam wrote:I know this because that is what I am

I hear that - you cant fix stupid - a lot


In modern day, stupid is just a word for "person I disagree with."

People can't tell the difference anymore because they're genuinely stupid.

User avatar
Gord
Obnoxious Weed
Posts: 31617
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:44 am
Custom Title: Silent Ork
Location: Transcona

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Gord » Mon Sep 17, 2018 5:32 am

psychiatry is a scam wrote:autism is just a fancy word for weak and stupid .

No it's not. People with autism have difficulty in communication and motor skills, but these are not considered "stupid". Poor skills in these areas can also lead to lower scores on IQ tests that do not accurately represent their actual IQ scores.

Here's an article on this subject from Psychology Today: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... ren-autism

I'll pick out a few significant sentences:

...Now it has become more widely recognized that autism has nothing to do with intelligence....

...IQ scores of children on the autism spectrum may not be accurate reflections of their innate intellectual potential....

...The reality is, It's hard to know how much a person on the autism spectrum knows because of the communication, motor, and sensory difficulties they may have....


Here's an article from AppliedBehaviorAnalysisEdu.org: https://www.appliedbehavioranalysisedu. ... elligence/

In the decades before autism was officially recognized and diagnosed, most autistic patients were relegated to the general diagnosis of mental retardation or, in milder cases, learning disabled....

...Today, autism is considered a separate disability from intellectual disability, which is the category assigned to anyone with an IQ at or below 70. Among the general population, intellectual disability rates run at about 1 percent; among ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) patients, the rate is closer to 40 percent according to the Center for Autism Research....

...A 2011 study looking into these issues concluded that the links between autism and intellectual disability were less common than had been historically assumed....

So people with autism are more likely to be assessed at lower IQs, but the testing systems may not be able to accurately measure their IQs.

Furthermore, from the previous link:

Autism Is Also Associated With Genius

...In 2015, Cambridge University undertook a study of almost half a million people and uncovered intriguing evidence that autistic traits (although not necessarily full-blown autism) are more common among people involved in the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields....

...Another study that same year uncovered a likely genetic link between autism and genius—families that were more likely to produce autistic children were also more likely to produce geniuses....

...More and more research is showing that ASD patients are closer to a normal range in both respects than was previously thought. Dealing with each patient as an individual, with their own capabilities and deficiencies, is the core of the functional behavior assessments used by applied behavior analysts to assess behavior deficits and develop treatment plans. In time, the appropriate therapies may prove to both expose and help develop the underlying intelligence of ASD patients.

In short, "autism" does not mean "weak and stupid".
"Knowledge grows through infinite timelessness" -- the random fictional Deepak Chopra quote site
"Imagine an ennobling of what could be" -- the New Age BS Generator site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE

User avatar
psychiatry is a scam
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1375
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:23 am

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby psychiatry is a scam » Tue Sep 18, 2018 12:35 am

anyway - when parents are looking for help , the system pretends to want to help .
but once the parents are gone - the labels change to schizoid , paranoid ,


and the meds are changed to anti psychotics like abilify - that lead to tardive dyskinesia

User avatar
Cadmusteeth
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:43 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Cadmusteeth » Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:01 am

psychiatry is a scam wrote:autism is just a fancy word for weak and stupid .
you cant fix stupid .
you can rob desperate parents tho

Gee thanks. You’re just alienated a whole group of people with actual problems. But hey! Maybe I’m just too stupid to actually know what you meant.

User avatar
Cadmusteeth
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:43 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Cadmusteeth » Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:07 am

psychiatry is a scam wrote:anyway - when parents are looking for help , the system pretends to want to help .
but once the parents are gone - the labels change to schizoid , paranoid ,


and the meds are changed to anti psychotics like abilify - that lead to tardive dyskinesia

Self-advocating and a support network can help fight these things. It’s not all doom and gloom.

User avatar
Gord
Obnoxious Weed
Posts: 31617
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:44 am
Custom Title: Silent Ork
Location: Transcona

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby Gord » Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:15 pm

psychiatry is a scam wrote:anyway - when parents are looking for help , the system pretends to want to help .
but once the parents are gone - the labels change to schizoid , paranoid ,


and the meds are changed to anti psychotics like abilify - that lead to tardive dyskinesia

If you've been diagnosed with schizoid personality disorder or paranoid personality disorder, it's probably because you display enough of the symptoms of schizoid personality disorder or paranoid personality disorder. The medication can help with that. Yes, the side effects can be unpleasant enough to make you want to not take the medication, but that doesn't make the diagnosis incorrect.
"Knowledge grows through infinite timelessness" -- the random fictional Deepak Chopra quote site
"Imagine an ennobling of what could be" -- the New Age BS Generator site
"You are also taking my words out of context." -- Justin
"Nullius in verba" -- The Royal Society ["take nobody's word for it"]
#ANDAMOVIE

KevinLevites
Poster
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2016 4:20 pm

Re: Packing Autistic Kids: A French Scandal

Postby KevinLevites » Wed Sep 19, 2018 5:45 am

I found this "idea about treating autism" to be horribly offensive (although I thank the original poster for bringing it to our attention) because I am autistic.

I currently don't speak to my family because they never accepted my autism. I'm in a similar situation with gay people who come from intensely religious families who believe that being gay is a choice.

My family believes that I choose to be autistic, and that the reason why therapy didn't work was because I didn't "try to get better" because "I want special treatment" so I "don't have to conform" and so on.

Things like this get me very angry.

I better shut up before I rant anymore.


Return to “Healthcare”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest