Must see history climate data tampering

Heated discussions on a hot topic.
User avatar
Jim Steele
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2590
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:42 am
Custom Title: Consensus is not evidence
Contact:

Must see history climate data tampering

Postby Jim Steele » Thu Dec 21, 2017 2:08 am

“In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." Galileo

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 12130
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Must see history climate data tampering

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Thu Dec 21, 2017 2:39 am

Yep. Lots of questions.

.......but sea level keeps rising.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
Jim Steele
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2590
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:42 am
Custom Title: Consensus is not evidence
Contact:

Re: Must see history climate data tampering

Postby Jim Steele » Thu Dec 21, 2017 2:45 am

Thus untampered data shows no correlation between sea level and temperature!

Steady upward trend is groundwater stored over the past 11,000 years still seeking an equilibrium with sea level
“In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." Galileo

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 12130
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Must see history climate data tampering

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Thu Dec 21, 2017 3:26 am

Jimbo: if two data sets are different, how do you determine which one is (more) accurate?

"In general"---later data is more accurate for a variety of reasons.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 12130
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Must see history climate data tampering

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Thu Dec 21, 2017 3:38 am

Re groundwater discharge: Nope. Still going up:

Image

https://climatesanity.files.wordpress.c ... =897&h=446

FTL: "Conclusion

What do you lying eyes tell you about the sea level from about 1930 to the 2000 in figure 6? Here is what I see: a sea-level rise rate that does not change much, with a pretty good fit to a line, ///// Again with the "no change in RATE...."to obscure the ADMISSION that sea level is CONSTANTLY RISING.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
Jim Steele
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2590
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:42 am
Custom Title: Consensus is not evidence
Contact:

Re: Must see history climate data tampering

Postby Jim Steele » Thu Dec 21, 2017 4:00 am

ROTFLMAO

Dear Boobo, you have so much to learn about sea level rise and its causes. You blindly confuse one graph as if it confirms your personal idea of reality. You seem unaware that natural groundwater discharge can cause a steady rise in sea level. So what's your point???? ROTFLMAO

Also rates of rise are always changing, There is no consensus on the rates during the 20th century, due to different methods, different choice of tide gages, and different choice of vertical land movement adjustments. Here is a graph from the last IPCC posted on Dr. Curry's website. Notice how the greatest rates of sea level rise occurred during the 30s and 40s, when CO2 had insignificant effects.

I suggest you do more reading and critical thinking.

Image
“In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual." Galileo

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 12130
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am

Re: Must see history climate data tampering

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Thu Dec 21, 2017 6:59 am

Jim Steele wrote:There is no consensus on the rates during the 20th century, due to different methods, different choice of tide gages,

Always................. sharp as a tack.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?


Return to “Climate Change”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest