Miss-identified.

What you think about how you think.
User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby placid » Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:45 am

Nikki Nyx wrote:Don't speak...I know just what you're saying, so please stop explaining.


Now we're talking.

Now that's what I'm talking about.

So why the need for a skeptic, who is the other talker talking itself out of a job? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Something clever should go here.

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:30 pm

bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:Nikki: if you might, what is your interest/pay off in responding to the gibberish offered by placid et al? Matt does it too but I think he is on a mission to expose scoundrels. Your interest seems more introspective. I stick my toe in and find the water to be too cold, aka: no pleasure at all. gibberish. whats the fun?
1. I detest hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance, so I enjoy exposing both by juxtaposing one person's contradictory posts.
2. It's fun thinking up gibberish in response to gibberish. For example, if one of them posts:
"There is only one."
I might respond:
"I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together."
Or:
"One is the loneliest number that you'll ever know."

I consider both of these pastimes intellectual exercise. :mrgreen:
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:34 pm

placid wrote:
Poodle wrote: Hitler
If Hitler was a real thing where is he now fool?

No thing ever happens fool.

Only no thing happens fool.

Real things cannot disappear, otherwise they're not real are they fool.

How thick do you want to be ...do you understand the concept real? it's just a fuking word fool, it's not real.
You lack creativity. I recommend Roget's.
Image
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
Poodle
Has More Than 9K Posts
Posts: 9218
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:12 pm
Custom Title: Regular sleeper
Location: NE corner of my living room

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Poodle » Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:41 pm

Something tells me placid thinks me a fool.

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:46 pm

placid wrote:Excellent
I know. I really think I missed my calling as a stand-up comedienne.
placid wrote:well that's one side of the story...
The story only has one side...the left side.
placid wrote:can you now describe this whole one sided story without using concepts?
As long as I can use precepts.
placid wrote:that's the rub...
No. This is the rub:
Meathead's Memphis Dust Rub Recipe by Meathead Goldwyn
¾ cup firmly packed dark brown sugar
¾ cup white sugar
½ cup paprika [I prefer smoked paprika, but regular is fine.]
¼ cup garlic powder
2 tablespoons ground black pepper
2 tablespoons ground ginger
2 tablespoons onion powder
2 teaspoons rosemary powder
Combine all ingredients until thoroughly blended. Transfer to a tightly-capped storage container. Makes 3 cups. Use about 2 tablespoons of Dust Rub per slab of ribs.
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby placid » Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:48 pm

Poodle wrote:Something tells me placid thinks me a fool.


You don't have to believe it.
Something clever should go here.

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:50 pm

placid wrote:
Nikki Nyx wrote:Don't speak...I know just what you're saying, so please stop explaining.
Now we're talking.

Now that's what I'm talking about.

So why the need for a skeptic, who is the other talker talking itself out of a job? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders—the most famous of which is Never get involved in a land war in Asia.—but only slightly less well-known is this: Never go in against a musician when death is on the line! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR3Vdo5etCQ
May I offer you a cup of iocane tea? :P
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:51 pm

Poodle wrote:Something tells me placid thinks me a fool.
At least the feeling is mutual. :mrgreen:
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby placid » Mon Jan 29, 2018 6:01 pm

Nikki Nyx wrote: I know. I really think I missed my calling as a stand-up comedienne.


Better luck next time.

Nikki Nyx wrote: The story only has one side...the left side.


Is that right.

Nikki Nyx wrote:As long as I can use precepts.


Granted.
I mean you'd have to be there to know an action had taken place.


Nikki Nyx wrote:No. This is the rub:
Meathead's Memphis Dust Rub Recipe by Meathead Goldwyn
¾ cup firmly packed dark brown sugar
¾ cup white sugar
½ cup paprika [I prefer smoked paprika, but regular is fine.]
¼ cup garlic powder
2 tablespoons ground black pepper
2 tablespoons ground ginger
2 tablespoons onion powder
2 teaspoons rosemary powder
Combine all ingredients until thoroughly blended. Transfer to a tightly-capped storage container. Makes 3 cups. Use about 2 tablespoons of Dust Rub per slab of ribs.


Thanks for showing your own interpretation of the rub.

I guess it is kind semi-interesting, if you like that kind of thing.
Something clever should go here.

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby placid » Mon Jan 29, 2018 6:04 pm

Nikki Nyx wrote:
placid wrote:
Nikki Nyx wrote:Don't speak...I know just what you're saying, so please stop explaining.
Now we're talking.

Now that's what I'm talking about.

So why the need for a skeptic, who is the other talker talking itself out of a job? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders—the most famous of which is Never get involved in a land war in Asia.—but only slightly less well-known is this: Never go in against a musician when death is on the line! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR3Vdo5etCQ
May I offer you a cup of iocane tea? :P


Okay if that's what you believe, it's your prerogative to believe what you want, your the believer maker... but it's not mine.
Something clever should go here.

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:39 pm

placid wrote:Okay if that's what you believe, it's your prerogative to believe what you want, your you're the believer maker... but it's not mine.
You? Your? You're? Mine? Your duality is showing. Zip up.
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby placid » Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:50 pm

Nikki Nyx wrote:
placid wrote:Okay if that's what you believe, it's your prerogative to believe what you want, your you're the believer maker... but it's not mine.
You? Your? You're? Mine? Your duality is showing. Zip up.


Yep, it's known to show up quite a lot... that's why they call it Non-duality.

Although it doesn't actually need to show up to it's own show...but it likes being the centre of attention all the time.
Something clever should go here.

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby placid » Mon Jan 29, 2018 8:53 pm

Nikki Nyx wrote:
placid wrote:Okay if that's what you believe, it's your prerogative to believe what you want, your you're the believer maker... but it's not mine.
You? Your? You're? Mine? Your duality is showing. Zip up.


Why cross out the your...you understand the meaning don't , isn't that enough for you?

Or you scared your going to fail your exam and be just a nobody?
Something clever should go here.

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:07 pm

placid wrote:
Nikki Nyx wrote:
placid wrote:Okay if that's what you believe, it's your prerogative to believe what you want, your you're the believer maker... but it's not mine.
You? Your? You're? Mine? Your duality is showing. Zip up.
Yep, it's known to show up quite a lot... that's why they call it Non-duality.
So, now you're claiming that duality is called non-duality? How do you not fall down more frequently? *sigh* I need a non-drink.

placid wrote:
Nikki Nyx wrote:
placid wrote:Okay if that's what you believe, it's your prerogative to believe what you want, your you're the believer maker... but it's not mine.
You? Your? You're? Mine? Your duality is showing. Zip up.
Why cross out the your...you understand the meaning don't , isn't that enough for you?
Why? Because I'm trying to help you properly express yourself! That's my job as a duly sworn Grammar Warrior. I'm earning a TON of commission from correcting you. Now, let me help you again, because I'm saving up for a vehicle.
placid should have written the following instead of what placid actually wrote:Why cross out the "your?" You understood what I meant, didn't you? Isn't that enough for you?
Cha-ching! I'm going to name my vehicle "Placid" in honor of you helping me reach my goal. I can't help but think it would be appropriate to purchase a dualie.
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby placid » Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:38 pm

Nikki Nyx wrote: So, now you're claiming that duality is called non-duality?


No, there is no one to claim Non-duality, because there is no such thing as Non-duality.

Non-duality is not a thing, it is no thing being everything.

Non-duality is duality.



Nikki Nyx wrote:How do you not fall down more frequently? *sigh* I need a non-drink.


The drink is real, there cannot be such a thing as a non-drink. The drink is an experience of consciousness.

Drinking a drink happens as a conscious experience, it is just an experience,, but no thing is experiencing this experience, you are the experience in the moment...no room to claim you are the one drinking the drink, drinking is just happening in the moment. Claiming is always past tense in memory long after the action has already occurred.
appearing as if it has happened now giving the illusory continuity to the sense of I

Investigate this for yourself and see that it is actually mutually compatible with your own dualistic ideas.
Something clever should go here.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 28098
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Debunk Advaita Vedanta Religion

Postby Matthew Ellard » Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:53 pm

placid wrote:The drink is real, there cannot be such a thing as a non-drink. The drink is an experience of consciousness.
H20 is a reality whether you think about it or not. :lol:

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Debunk Advaita Vedanta Religion

Postby placid » Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:36 am

Matthew Ellard wrote:
placid wrote:The drink is real, there cannot be such a thing as a non-drink. The drink is an experience of consciousness.
H20 is a reality whether you think about it or not. :lol:


Reality does not have to think about being in order for it to be. Reality is prior to thought, thoughts arise here, but have no reality in and of themselves separate from the reality they are arising in which is thoughtless.
Something clever should go here.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 28098
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Debunk Advaita Vedanta Religion

Postby Matthew Ellard » Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:41 am

placid wrote: Reality does not have to think about being in order for it to be.
That's right. An electron doesn't think at all.

You are slowly learning from us, very slowly, but learning.
:lol:

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Debunk Advaita Vedanta Religion

Postby placid » Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:28 am

Matthew Ellard wrote:
placid wrote: Reality does not have to think about being in order for it to be.
That's right. An electron doesn't think at all.

You are slowly learning from us, very slowly, but learning.
:lol:


That's right, no concept ever thought a thought, thoughts can't think.

Nothing to learn, only unlearn. Learning is for phantoms only when they want to believe they exist, thought does this somehow, don't ask me how, I've no idea.
Something clever should go here.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 28098
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Debunk Advaita Vedanta Religion

Postby Matthew Ellard » Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:31 am

Matthew Ellard wrote: That's right. An electron doesn't think at all. You are slowly learning from us, very slowly, but learning. :lol:
placid wrote: no concept ever thought a thought, thoughts can't think.
Electrons are not concepts. Otherwise your computer wouldn't work.

Did you forget again?
:lol:

placid wrote: I've no idea.
Agreed. :lol:

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Debunk Advaita Vedanta Religion

Postby placid » Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:43 am

Matthew Ellard wrote:Electrons are not concepts. Otherwise your computer wouldn't work.


Try switching on the electric supply that feeds it, that might help.
Something clever should go here.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 28098
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Debunk Advaita Vedanta Religion

Postby Matthew Ellard » Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:47 am

placid wrote:Electrons are not real, they are concepts.
Matthew Ellard wrote:Electrons are not concepts. Otherwise your computer wouldn't work.
placid wrote:Try switching on the electric supply that feeds it, that might help.
You complete idiot. Electrons are electricity. :lol: :lol:

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Debunk Advaita Vedanta Religion

Postby placid » Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:52 am

Matthew Ellard wrote:
placid wrote:Electrons are not real, they are concepts.
Matthew Ellard wrote:Electrons are not concepts. Otherwise your computer wouldn't work.
placid wrote:Try switching on the electric supply that feeds it, that might help.
You complete idiot. Electrons are electricity. :lol: :lol:


And so are you fool.
Something clever should go here.

Matthew Ellard
Real Skeptic
Posts: 28098
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:31 am

Re: Debunk Advaita Vedanta Religion

Postby Matthew Ellard » Tue Jan 30, 2018 2:14 am

placid wrote: And so are you fool.
Now pull out your computer's wall plug and use your advaita religious shared consciousness to make your next post. :D

Have you worked out why the screen isn't working? (probably not)
:lol:

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Tue Jan 30, 2018 2:14 am

placid wrote:
Nikki Nyx wrote: So, now you're claiming that duality is called non-duality?
No, there is no one to claim Non-duality, because there is no such thing as Non-duality.
Well, then, we can safely bring this discussion to a close, since we're talking about nothing.

placid wrote:
Nikki Nyx wrote:How do you not fall down more frequently? *sigh* I need a non-drink.
The drink is real, there cannot be such a thing as a non-drink.
Nope. It remains in potentia as a non-drink, since I never made it.

placid wrote:Drinking a drink happens as a conscious experience, it is just an experience,, but no thing is experiencing this experience, you are the experience in the moment...no room to claim you are the one drinking the drink, drinking is just happening in the moment. Claiming is always past tense in memory long after the action has already occurred.
appearing as if it has happened now giving the illusory continuity to the sense of I
Reading your posts is like trying to read Dostoevsky that's been translated from Russian into Sanskrit by a person who only speaks Swahili...whilst blind drunk, walking a tightrope across the Grand Canyon, and juggling running chainsaws. In a snowstorm. At night. With a migraine. Yep, I think that's all of it.
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
Dimebag
Regular Poster
Posts: 767
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:05 pm

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Dimebag » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:46 am

This is an endless loop of frustration that people seem to be engaged in here, which I think has been caused by two fundamentally different ways of trying to understand the world. Placid seems to be engaged in what I have come to find is called "Paralogical thinking"
Logical thinking is based on the principle that something is either true or it isn’t true, so the opposite of a logical truth is plainly false.

Paralogical thinking is based on the realization that on a deep level life is paradoxical, so the opposite of a paralogical truth is also true.

Taken from this website: https://www.scienceandnonduality.com/paralogical-thinking/

Unfortunately, if this wasn't bad enough to logical thinking, it is also laced with new age jargon, which instantly sets most sceptical thinkers alarm bells off.

The sad part is, even if placid did have something of substance to say, it's meaning is lost within these two frameworks which are at odds with logic and reason.

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:44 am

Dimebag wrote:This is an endless loop of frustration that people seem to be engaged in here, which I think has been caused by two fundamentally different ways of trying to understand the world. Placid seems to be engaged in what I have come to find is called "Paralogical thinking"
Logical thinking is based on the principle that something is either true or it isn’t true, so the opposite of a logical truth is plainly false.

Paralogical thinking is based on the realization that on a deep level life is paradoxical, so the opposite of a paralogical truth is also true.

Taken from this website: https://www.scienceandnonduality.com/paralogical-thinking/
I'm not sure I agree with their definition of logical thinking. I don't think of things as either true or not true, but in one of three ways:
1. proven to be factual based on the currently available data (e.g. gravity sucks :mrgreen: ),
2. proven to be not factual based on the currently available data (e.g. 1 + 1 ≠ 3), and
3. insufficient evidence to make a determination (e.g. life after death).
Some might add a fourth category—cannot be proven to be factual—but I hesitate to make such a judgment, since it may actually be based on a lack of evidence or a bias, so I prefer to put unanswered questions into the third category until additional data is discovered, if ever.

I also disagree that life is paradoxical. Chaos makes life appear to be paradoxical at times, but only when you attempt to impose order on chaos (e.g. Why me? To which the factual answer is, "Why not you?" :P ).

I do, however, agree with your analysis of this discussion. Placid continues to claim certain things are true, and we keep saying insufficient evidence, which s/he takes as not true, and that's not what we mean. (Or, at least, it's not what I mean. I shouldn't speak for others.)
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
Archer17
New Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:27 am

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Archer17 » Wed Jan 31, 2018 7:15 am

^
What Nikki said.
The plural of anecdote is not data.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 13903
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am
Custom Title: bobbo da existential pragmatist

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Wed Jan 31, 2018 10:16 am

Moslty: "Things" are true or not true. We just don't know which one applies.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Wed Jan 31, 2018 4:02 pm

Archer17 wrote:^
What Nikki said.
I absolutely LOVE your signature line. Brilliant!
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Wed Jan 31, 2018 4:05 pm

bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:Moslty: "Things" are true or not true. We just don't know which one applies.
I agree, Bobbo. But we can't say something is not true simply because we lack data. Also, as I said to Placid, I hesitate to use "true" in place of "factual." Yes, the dictionary definition of "true" is "in accordance with fact or reality," but people often talk about The Truth™...and they're almost never discussing reality. :mrgreen:
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 13903
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am
Custom Title: bobbo da existential pragmatist

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Wed Jan 31, 2018 9:12 pm

Nikki Nyx wrote:
bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:Moslty: "Things" are true or not true. We just don't know which one applies.
I agree, Bobbo. But we can't say something is not true simply because we lack data.
Yes....... thats the direct implication. Neither true nor not true can be determined......depending on the set up or hypothetical drawn. Absent a woo factor, we can say its true the Earth is more than 15 seconds old. In fact, stiring the brain cells more, or to be more clear, Much has been established as true or not true. turns out...most things people have thought have been proven to be not true. What we are talking about is the edge of the new frontier when it comes to things science, or the constant ambiguity of human activities and social concerns. Two different magisteriums as some have pointed out.

I too was drawn to Archers signature line. Lots of anecdotes though is one kind of data field. Opinion surveys, the search for Shangri-La, all sorts of things. Unless one defines the terms to avoid the dictionary. Sad how many aphorisms fall to scrutiny.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby placid » Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:59 am

bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:
Nikki Nyx wrote:
bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:Moslty: "Things" are true or not true. We just don't know which one applies.
I agree, Bobbo. But we can't say something is not true simply because we lack data.


There is no one to know truth. Truth is not-knowing knowing...to know is an illusion created by the knower, the same one.

This paradox is unavoidable because all there are here are words trying to describe the wordless.

Truth does not exist in reality. Truth is just a word attempting to describe the ineffable.

The one claiming to know whether something is truth or not is the obscurity to real truth ..which is there is no one to define anything, and that that is the only defining that is happening...it's all a fiction arising within itself.

It's like a shadow looking for it's source ..a shadow can never see the castor aka the source while it the shadow believes it is the one existing, thus obscuring the real castor it seeks.. it fails to see it is already what it seeks...aka it's already the castor aka the light aka no thing casting every thing.

The seeing only likes to focus on what is in front of it, because that's the only thing it can see...when it seeks for answers as through science (an idea) ...it cannot find the answer in what it is looking at because what is seen is inseparable from what is looking...but it never thinks to look at what is looking, and so misses the answer it is looking for....which is... It's already the source of that is looking for....which is no thing appearing as thing.

Any thing seen can't see anything, it doesn't exist apart from the seer...so the known, the seen, the shadow is always looking through the wrong side of the telescope ..looking for its self out-there, when it is always and ever right here where it never moves or changes.

It's no wonder it gets a little confused...but it's only ever the same one self dreaming difference where there is none.

.

No thing can lack data...you are the data aka no thing appearing as thing.

This seeming paradox cannot be negated...that would require one stepping outside their consciousness, which is impossible since there is no thing conscious....there is only consciousness and the contents of consciousness....same one.
Something clever should go here.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist
Has No Life
Posts: 13903
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 9:39 am
Custom Title: bobbo da existential pragmatist

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby bobbo_the_Pragmatist » Thu Feb 01, 2018 2:49 pm

Sad................when posting a reply is nothing but finger exercise.
Real Name: bobbo the existential pragmatic evangelical anti-theist and Class Warrior.
Asking: What is the most good for the most people?
Sample Issue: Should the Feds provide all babies with free diapers?

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby placid » Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:51 pm

bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:Sad................when posting a reply is nothing but finger exercise.


If it's that sad, then stop doing it.

It's not rocket science.

I love doing nothing ..it's the only thing I do.

I love knowing nothing, it's the only thing I know anything about.

About you?
Something clever should go here.

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:41 pm

bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:
Nikki Nyx wrote:
bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:Moslty: "Things" are true or not true. We just don't know which one applies.
I agree, Bobbo. But we can't say something is not true simply because we lack data.
Yes....... thats the direct implication. Neither true nor not true can be determined......depending on the set up or hypothetical drawn.
At a deeper level, I agree. The best we can do is accept that data either is in line with observable reality...or not.

bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:What we are talking about is the edge of the new frontier when it comes to things science, or the constant ambiguity of human activities and social concerns. Two different magisteriums as some have pointed out.
...that are constantly butting heads...lol. At the extremes, one group believes in human dominion, while the other believes that the works of man are "unnatural." They're both wrong. The first group ignores the future, and the second group ignores the past.
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
Nikki Nyx
Persistent Poster
Posts: 3159
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:40 am
Custom Title: cognitively consonant
Location: playing croquet in Wonderland

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Nikki Nyx » Thu Feb 01, 2018 6:17 pm

placid wrote:
bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:
Nikki Nyx wrote:
bobbo_the_Pragmatist wrote:Moslty: "Things" are true or not true. We just don't know which one applies.
I agree, Bobbo. But we can't say something is not true simply because we lack data.
There is no one to know truth. Truth is not-knowing knowing...to know is an illusion created by the knower, the same one.
I see you've returned to incomprehensible double-speak. Frankly, it's irrelevant whether knowledge is an illusion or not, since we would quickly die without it.

If I wish to continue experiencing the thing called "life," then I must learn as much as possible about the reality in which I live. You cannot say that reality is an illusion, nor do you truly believe that. If you did, you wouldn't bother eating, drinking, protecting yourself from the elements, and so on. There's no need to care for personal needs in a dream, but the need manifestly exists in waking reality...which neatly distinguishes the two states as separate.

placid wrote:This paradox is unavoidable because all there are here are words trying to describe the wordless.
Words are the symbols we use to describe the reality in which we live, and to communicate with one another. That doesn't mean that words are able to describe everything; sometimes a different set of symbols is required: mathematics.

placid wrote:Truth does not exist in reality. Truth is just a word attempting to describe the ineffable.
"Truth" may not exist, but facts based on consistent and repeated observation do exist. The reality in which we live has rules. If you jump off a tall building, gravity will drag you back to Earth with unfortunate consequences, since the shell in which you live is incompatible with flying.

placid wrote:...when it seeks for answers as through science (an idea) ...it cannot find the answer in what it is looking at because what is seen is inseparable from what is looking...but it never thinks to look at what is looking
False. It is a recognized concept in science that the action of observing can change the actions of the observed.
One of the most bizarre premises of quantum theory, which has long fascinated philosophers and physicists alike, states that by the very act of watching, the observer affects the observed reality.

...researchers at the Weizmann Institute of Science have now conducted a highly controlled experiment demonstrating how a beam of electrons is affected by the act of being observed. The experiment revealed that the greater the amount of "watching," the greater the observer's influence on what actually takes place.

Once an observer begins to watch the particles going through the openings, the picture changes dramatically: if a particle can be seen going through one opening, then it's clear it didn't go through another. In other words, when under observation, electrons are being "forced" to behave like particles and not like waves. Thus the mere act of observation affects the experimental findings.
"An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."—Marcello Truzzi

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."—Christopher Hitchens

User avatar
Poodle
Has More Than 9K Posts
Posts: 9218
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:12 pm
Custom Title: Regular sleeper
Location: NE corner of my living room

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Poodle » Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:11 pm

NOOOOOOOOO!!!!! Don't give her quantum theory. Her head will explode.


What am I saying?

http://www.abarim-publications.com/Quan ... nN0MnXFJGM

Read it, placid. READ IT ALL!

User avatar
placid
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:39 am

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby placid » Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:08 am

Poodle wrote:NOOOOOOOOO!!!!! Don't give her quantum theory. Her head will explode.


What am I saying?

http://www.abarim-publications.com/Quan ... nN0MnXFJGM

Read it, placid. READ IT ALL!


Know it all already.

It's like what Confy said, what's the point of reading anymore when you have figured out what's really going on, history books kind of lose there appeal from then on in.

Awakening is the end of knowledge.

It's death before you die.
Something clever should go here.

User avatar
Poodle
Has More Than 9K Posts
Posts: 9218
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 9:12 pm
Custom Title: Regular sleeper
Location: NE corner of my living room

Re: Miss-identified.

Postby Poodle » Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:16 am

placid wrote:
Poodle wrote:NOOOOOOOOO!!!!! Don't give her quantum theory. Her head will explode.


What am I saying?

http://www.abarim-publications.com/Quan ... nN0MnXFJGM

Read it, placid. READ IT ALL!


Know it all already..


:shock:
:P
:D
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Return to “Brain, Mind, & Consciousness”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest